Deaton R J, Illingworth P M, Bursztajn H J
Gallahue Mental Health Center, Indianapolis, IN.
Am J Psychother. 1992 Oct;46(4):526-31. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1992.46.4.526.
Even though much has been written about the issue of criminalization of therapist-patient sex, many questions about the issue remain unanswered, raising doubts about the wisdom of nationwide adoption of criminalizing legislation. From a philosophical standpoint, we need to understand more fully what thoughts, emotions, and behaviors constitute consent. Furthermore we must determine how much value to give consent in relation to other social values and goals. From a clinical standpoint we still need a better understanding of what constitutes the therapist-patient relationship: what it is and when it is over. We must also examine more carefully the nature of power within a psychotherapeutic relationship. From a legal standpoint we must determine how criminalization affects constitutional privacy rights, as embodied both in state constitutions and the federal Constitution. From an empirical standpoint we need to assess the efficacy of current criminalization statutes and determine their effect on tort compensation for patient victims. We also need to assess the practical application of these statutes by juries. Without more thorough analysis of all the issues raised, the criminalization of patient-therapist sex by state legislatures may in fact cause more harm than good.
尽管关于治疗师与患者发生性行为犯罪化的问题已有诸多著述,但该问题的许多方面仍未得到解答,这引发了对在全国范围内采用刑事定罪立法是否明智的质疑。从哲学角度来看,我们需要更全面地理解哪些思想、情感和行为构成同意。此外,我们必须确定相对于其他社会价值观和目标,应给予同意多少价值考量。从临床角度而言,我们仍需更好地理解治疗师与患者关系的构成:它是什么以及何时结束。我们还必须更仔细地审视心理治疗关系中权力的本质。从法律角度来说,我们必须确定刑事定罪如何影响体现在州宪法和联邦宪法中的宪法隐私权。从实证角度出发,我们需要评估现行刑事定罪法规的效力,并确定它们对患者受害者侵权赔偿的影响。我们还需要评估陪审团对这些法规的实际应用情况。如果不对所提出的所有问题进行更深入的分析,州立法机构将治疗师与患者发生性行为定罪实际上可能弊大于利。