Pyogenic infections in orthopedic surgery. Prevention and management.

A problem that confronts surgeons in clinical practice is that a patient may acquire new infections while in the hospital. When such infections occur they are predominantly staphylococcal and these bacteria are often, but not always resistant to penicillin, streptomycin and the tetracycline antibiotics. They are often but neither completely nor uniformly sensitive to the newer or less frequently used antimicrobial agents. The extension of antibiotic usage from proven situations to "routine" prophylaxis has been a widespread practice. There are many reasons to discourage and to reexamine the validity and purpose, as well as the safety of this practice. We now have sufficient background and experience to revert from widespread and indiscriminate use to a practice of discriminate prophylactic therapy. In general, soft tissue lacerations and clean wounds do not require operation under an "antibiotic umbrella." Similarly, elective orthopedic surgical procedures of soft tissues such as muscle biopsy, tenorrhaphy and muscle and tendon transplants as well as plastic surgical procedures can be safely performed without antibiotic therapy if technique is good and operation not prolonged. Operations of major magnitude on the motor-skeletal system, such as open fractures, internal fixation of fractures with bone grafts, and major operations of joints are indication for antibiotic therapy for impending infection postoperatively for five days. Reliance is mainly on antistaphylococcal drugs to which hospital organisms are predominantly sensitive. The two remaining indications for antibiotic therapy against impending infection are: (1) major crush injury-for example, to the thigh-and (2) the need for a patient with a healing fracture to have other surgical procedures such as tooth extraction or excision of an infected area which might predispose to transient bacteremia and embolic infection in bone or joint.