Smith I, White P F
Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Anesthesiology. 1992 Nov;77(5):850-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199211000-00003.
The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) has recently become available in the United States, and several authors have suggested that it is superior to an anesthesia mask. To test this hypothesis, 64 patients undergoing outpatient arthroscopic knee surgery were randomly assigned to have anesthesia maintained via either a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) (n = 31) or a standard face mask (n = 33). Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 1 microgram.kg-1 and propofol 2 mg.kg-1 and maintained with a variable-rate propofol infusion (50-180 micrograms.kg-1 x min) and nitrous oxide 67% in oxygen. The LMA was inserted without difficulty by inexperienced anesthesiologists in 90% of the patients. Problems associated with airway management were more common in patients in the face mask (control) group. Episodes of hemoglobin oxygen desaturation (< 95%) occurred in 52% of patients in the face mask group compared to only 13% in the LMA group (P < 0.05). Intraoperative airway manipulations were required in 15% of face mask patients (vs. 3% of the LMA group), and difficulties in maintaining an airway were reported by 24% of the resident anesthesiologists caring for patients in the face mask group (vs. none in the LMA group) (P < 0.05). Insertion of the LMA was not associated with any acute changes in hemodynamic values. Intraoperative hemodynamic values and anesthetic requirements did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. There were no significant differences in the emergence and recovery times or in the incidence of postoperative sore throats between the two groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
喉罩气道(LMA)最近在美国开始应用,一些作者认为它优于麻醉面罩。为验证这一假设,64例行门诊膝关节镜手术的患者被随机分为两组,一组通过喉罩气道(LMA)维持麻醉(n = 31),另一组通过标准面罩维持麻醉(n = 33)。麻醉诱导采用1微克/千克芬太尼和2毫克/千克丙泊酚,维持麻醉采用丙泊酚变率输注(50 - 180微克/千克·分钟)和67%氧化亚氮与氧气混合气体。90%的患者由经验不足的麻醉医生顺利插入LMA。与气道管理相关的问题在面罩(对照组)组患者中更常见。面罩组52%的患者出现血红蛋白氧饱和度下降(< 95%),而LMA组仅为13%(P < 0.05)。15%的面罩组患者需要术中气道操作(LMA组为3%),负责面罩组患者的住院麻醉医生中有24%报告维持气道困难(LMA组无)(P < 0.05)。LMA插入与血流动力学值的任何急性变化无关。两个治疗组的术中血流动力学值和麻醉需求无显著差异。两组在苏醒和恢复时间或术后咽痛发生率方面无显著差异。(摘要截短于250字)