• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自非亲属活体供体的肾移植。

Kidney transplantation from living unrelated donors.

作者信息

Sesso R, Klag M J, Ancao M S, Whelton P K, Seidler A, Sigulem D, Ramos O L

机构信息

Escola Paulista de Medicina, Division of Nephrology, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1992 Dec 15;117(12):983-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-12-983.

DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-117-12-983
PMID:1443985
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare patient and graft survival of recipients of kidneys from living, unrelated donors (LUDs); cadaveric donors; and living, related donors (LRDs) matched for zero (mismatched), one, or two (identical) haplotypes.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

Sixty-three renal transplantation centers affiliated with the Brazilian Transplantation Registry (accounting for more than 95% of the transplantation activity in Brazil).

PATIENTS

Patients having renal transplantation between January 1987 and March 1991. Of 2892 patients, 165 (6%) received transplants from LUDs; 964 (33%), from cadaveric donors; 183 (6%), from zero haplotype, HLA-matched LRDs; 1259 (44%), from one haplotype-matched LRDs; and 321 (11%), from two haplotype-matched LRDs.

MEASUREMENTS

Patient and graft survival. Patients were followed for an average of 15.8 months.

RESULTS

After adjustment for age, race, diagnosis of primary disease, history of previous transplantation, cyclosporine use, and number of transplants from LUDs per center, patient survival did not differ statistically for recipients of kidneys from LUDs and recipients of cadaveric kidneys (risk ratio [RR], 1.16; 95% Cl, 0.68 to 1.98). Little difference was seen between the adjusted death rate for recipients of zero haplotype-matched LRDs and recipients of cadaveric kidneys (RR, 1.13; Cl, 0.69 to 1.87). Similarly, in a multivariate analysis, recipients of kidneys taken from LUDs and zero haplotype-matched LRDs had a risk for graft failure that did not differ statistically from that of cadaveric kidney recipients (RR, 0.74; Cl, 0.45 to 1.22 and RR, 0.82; Cl, 0.53 to 1.25, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Graft survival for recipients of kidneys from LUDs is similar to that from zero haplotype-matched LRDs and is at least as good as that achieved with cadaveric transplants.

摘要

目的

比较接受来自活体非亲属供者(LUDs)、尸体供者以及零个(不匹配)、一个或两个(完全相同)单倍型匹配的活体亲属供者(LRDs)肾脏移植受者的患者和移植物存活率。

设计

队列研究。

地点

隶属于巴西移植登记处的63个肾移植中心(占巴西移植活动的95%以上)。

患者

1987年1月至1991年3月期间接受肾移植的患者。在2892例患者中,165例(6%)接受了来自LUDs的移植;964例(33%)接受了来自尸体供者的移植;183例(6%)接受了零个单倍型匹配的HLA匹配LRDs的移植;1259例(44%)接受了一个单倍型匹配LRDs的移植;321例(11%)接受了两个单倍型匹配LRDs的移植。

测量指标

患者和移植物存活率。对患者平均随访15.8个月。

结果

在对年龄、种族、原发性疾病诊断、既往移植史、环孢素使用情况以及每个中心来自LUDs的移植数量进行调整后,接受LUDs肾脏移植受者和接受尸体肾脏移植受者的患者存活率在统计学上无差异(风险比[RR],1.16;95%可信区间[Cl],0.68至1.98)。零个单倍型匹配LRDs移植受者的校正死亡率与尸体肾脏移植受者之间差异不大(RR,1.13;Cl,0.69至1.87)。同样,在多变量分析中,接受LUDs肾脏移植受者和零个单倍型匹配LRDs移植受者的移植物失败风险与尸体肾脏移植受者相比在统计学上无差异(RR分别为0.74;Cl,0.45至1.22和RR,0.82;Cl,0.53至1.25)。

结论

接受LUDs肾脏移植受者的移植物存活率与零个单倍型匹配LRDs移植受者相似,且至少与尸体移植的存活率一样好。

相似文献

1
Kidney transplantation from living unrelated donors.来自非亲属活体供体的肾移植。
Ann Intern Med. 1992 Dec 15;117(12):983-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-12-983.
2
The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry.美国器官共享联合网络科学肾脏移植登记处。
Clin Transpl. 1999:1-21.
3
The UNOS scientific renal transplant registry. United Network for Organ Sharing.美国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)的科学肾脏移植登记处。
Clin Transpl. 1995:1-18.
4
The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry--ten years of kidney transplants.美国器官共享联合网络科学肾脏移植登记处——十年肾脏移植情况
Clin Transpl. 1997:1-14.
5
The UNOS renal transplant registry.美国器官共享联合网络肾脏移植登记处。
Clin Transpl. 2001:1-18.
6
Survival of nationally shared, HLA-matched kidney transplants from cadaveric donors. The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry.来自尸体供者的全国共享、HLA配型相合肾移植的存活情况。美国器官共享联合网络科学肾脏移植登记处。
N Engl J Med. 1992 Sep 17;327(12):834-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199209173271202.
7
Annual trends and triple therapy--1991-2000.1991 - 2000年的年度趋势与三联疗法
Clin Transpl. 2001:247-69.
8
The OPTN/UNOS Renal Transplant Registry.器官获取与移植网络/美国器官共享联合网络肾脏移植登记处
Clin Transpl. 2005:1-16.
9
A retrospective study of kidney transplant recipients from living unrelated donors.一项针对来自非亲属活体供体的肾移植受者的回顾性研究。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998 Apr;9(4):684-91. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V94684.
10
The UNOS Renal Transplant Registry.美国器官共享联合网络肾脏移植登记处。
Clin Transpl. 2002:1-20.

引用本文的文献

1
How good is a living donor? Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of donor demographics on post kidney transplant outcomes.供体质量如何?供体人口统计学特征对肾移植后结局影响的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Nephrol. 2022 Apr;35(3):807-820. doi: 10.1007/s40620-021-01231-7. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
2
Living related and unrelated donors for kidney transplantation. A 28-year experience.肾移植的活体亲属供体和非亲属供体。28年的经验。
Ann Surg. 1995 Sep;222(3):353-62; discussion 362-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199509000-00012.