Suppr超能文献

减肥手术的成本效益。

The cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery.

作者信息

Fang John

机构信息

University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Sep;98(9):2097-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07671.x.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of gastric bypass in the treatment of severe obesity (body mass index > 40). A deterministic decision analysis that compared the lifetime expected costs and outcomes between open gastric bypass and no treatment of severe obesity from the payer perspective was performed. Men and women between the ages of 35 and 55 yr, with body mass index between 40 and 50 kg/m(2), who did not have cardiac disease and who failed conservative treatment, including pharmacotherapy, were included. Cost-effectiveness ratio of the base case conditions was made with parameter estimates from the literature and expert discussion and expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). One- and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed on selected variables. Gastric bypass was not cost-saving, because the reduction in lifetime medical costs was less than the cost of treatment in any subgroup. The base case cost-effectiveness ratios ranged from 5,400 US dollars to 16,100 US dollars for women and from 10,700 US dollars to 35,600 US dollars per QALY for men. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that in older, less obese men, the cost effectiveness ratio was responsive to the amount of weight lost, obesity-related quality of life, and complication rates. Parameter variation did not significantly affect cost-effectiveness ratios in the remaining patients. The authors concluded that gastric bypass is a cost-effective alternative to no treatment in the severely obese, at less than 50,000 US dollars per QALY.

摘要

该研究的目的是评估胃旁路手术治疗重度肥胖(体重指数>40)的成本效益。从支付方的角度进行了确定性决策分析,比较了开放式胃旁路手术与不治疗重度肥胖的终身预期成本和结果。纳入年龄在35至55岁之间、体重指数在40至50kg/m²之间、无心脏病且保守治疗(包括药物治疗)失败的男性和女性。基础病例条件的成本效益比采用文献参数估计和专家讨论得出,并表示为每质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本。对选定变量进行了单因素和双因素敏感性分析。胃旁路手术并不节省成本,因为任何亚组中终身医疗成本的降低都小于治疗成本。基础病例成本效益比女性为每QALY 5400美元至16100美元,男性为每QALY 10700美元至35600美元。敏感性分析表明,在年龄较大、肥胖程度较低的男性中,成本效益比受体重减轻量、肥胖相关生活质量和并发症发生率的影响。参数变化对其余患者的成本效益比没有显著影响。作者得出结论,胃旁路手术是重度肥胖患者不治疗的一种具有成本效益的替代方案,每QALY成本低于50000美元。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验