Suppr超能文献

门诊膝关节镜检查中腰大肌间隙阻滞与脊髓麻醉和全身麻醉的比较。

A comparison of psoas compartment block and spinal and general anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy.

作者信息

Jankowski Christopher J, Hebl James R, Stuart Michael J, Rock Michael G, Pagnano Mark W, Beighley Christopher M, Schroeder Darrell R, Horlocker Terese T

机构信息

Departments of *Anesthesiology, †Orthopedic Surgery, and ‡Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2003 Oct;97(4):1003-1009. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000081798.89853.E7.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The optimal anesthetic technique for outpatient knee arthroscopy remains controversial. In this study, we evaluated surgical operating conditions, patient satisfaction, recovery times, and postoperative analgesic requirements associated with psoas compartment block, general anesthetic, or spinal anesthetic techniques. Sixty patients were randomized to receive a propofol/nitrous oxide/fentanyl general anesthetic, spinal anesthesia with 6 mg of bupivacaine and 15 micro g of fentanyl, or psoas compartment block with 40 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine. All patients received IV ketorolac and intraarticular bupivacaine. The frequency of postanesthesia recovery room admission was 13 (65%) of 20 for patients receiving general anesthesia, compared with 0 of 21 for patients receiving spinal anesthesia and 1 (5%) of 19 for patients receiving psoas block (P < 0.001). The median time from the end of surgery to meeting hospital discharge criteria did not differ across groups (131, 129, and 110 min for general, spinal, and psoas groups, respectively). In the hospital, 45% of general anesthesia patients received opioid analgesics, compared with 14% of spinal anesthesia and 21% of psoas block patients (P = 0.087). There was no difference among groups with respect to the time of first analgesic use or the number of patients requiring opioid analgesia. Pain scores were highest in patients receiving general anesthesia at 30 min (P = 0.032) and at 60, 90, and 120 min (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction with anesthetic technique (P = 0.025) and pain management (P = 0.009) differed significantly across groups; patients receiving general anesthesia reported lower satisfaction ratings. We conclude that spinal anesthesia or psoas block is superior to general anesthesia for knee arthroscopy when considering resource utilization, patient satisfaction, and postoperative analgesic management.

IMPLICATIONS

Outpatient knee arthroscopy may be performed using a variety of anesthetic techniques. We report that spinal anesthesia and psoas compartment block are superior to general anesthesia when considering resource utilization, patient satisfaction, and postoperative analgesic management.

摘要

未标注

门诊膝关节镜检查的最佳麻醉技术仍存在争议。在本研究中,我们评估了与腰大肌间隙阻滞、全身麻醉或脊髓麻醉技术相关的手术操作条件、患者满意度、恢复时间和术后镇痛需求。60例患者被随机分为三组,分别接受丙泊酚/氧化亚氮/芬太尼全身麻醉、6mg布比卡因和15μg芬太尼的脊髓麻醉或40mL 1.5%甲哌卡因的腰大肌间隙阻滞。所有患者均接受静脉注射酮咯酸和关节腔内注射布比卡因。接受全身麻醉的20例患者中,有13例(65%)进入麻醉后恢复室,而接受脊髓麻醉的21例患者中为0例,接受腰大肌间隙阻滞的19例患者中有1例(5%)(P<0.001)。手术结束至达到出院标准的中位时间在各组之间无差异(全身麻醉组、脊髓麻醉组和腰大肌间隙阻滞组分别为131、129和110分钟)。在医院内,45%的全身麻醉患者接受了阿片类镇痛药,而脊髓麻醉患者为14%,腰大肌间隙阻滞患者为21%(P = 0.087)。各组在首次使用镇痛药的时间或需要阿片类镇痛药的患者数量方面没有差异。在30分钟时(P = 0.032)以及60、90和120分钟时(P<0.001),接受全身麻醉的患者疼痛评分最高。患者对麻醉技术(P = 0.025)和疼痛管理(P = 0.009)的满意度在各组之间存在显著差异;接受全身麻醉的患者报告的满意度较低。我们得出结论,在考虑资源利用、患者满意度和术后镇痛管理时,脊髓麻醉或腰大肌间隙阻滞在膝关节镜检查中优于全身麻醉。

启示

门诊膝关节镜检查可以使用多种麻醉技术。我们报告,在考虑资源利用、患者满意度和术后镇痛管理时,脊髓麻醉和腰大肌间隙阻滞优于全身麻醉。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验