Suppr超能文献

在超抗原诱导的耐受性中,CD4+CD25+和CD4+CD25- T细胞分别作为诱导性和效应性T抑制细胞发挥作用。

CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25- T cells act respectively as inducer and effector T suppressor cells in superantigen-induced tolerance.

作者信息

Feunou Pascal, Poulin Lionel, Habran Claude, Le Moine Alain, Goldman Michel, Braun Michel Y

机构信息

Laboratory of Experimental Immunology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Immunol. 2003 Oct 1;171(7):3475-84. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.7.3475.

Abstract

The repeated injection of low doses of bacterial superantigens (SAg) is known to induce specific T cell unresponsiveness. We show in this study that the spleen of BALB/c mice receiving chronically, staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) contains SEB-specific CD4(+) TCRBV8(+) T cells exerting an immune regulatory function on SEB-specific primary T cell responses. Suppression affects IL-2 and IFN-gamma secretion as well as proliferation of T cells. However, the suppressor cells differ from the natural CD4(+) T regulatory cells, described recently in human and mouse, because they do not express cell surface CD25. They are CD152 (CTLA-4)-negative and their regulatory activity is not associated with expression of the NF Foxp3. By contrast, after repeated SEB injection, CD4(+)CD25(+) splenocytes were heterogenous and contained both effector as well as regulatory cells. In vivo, CD4(+)CD25(-) T regulatory cells prevented SEB-induced death independently of CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells. Nevertheless, SEB-induced tolerance could not be achieved in thymectomized CD25(+) cell-depleted mice because repeated injection of SEB did not avert lethal toxic shock in these animals. Collectively, these data demonstrate that, whereas CD4(+)CD25(+) T regulatory cells are required for the induction of SAg-induced tolerance, CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells exert their regulatory activity at the maintenance stage of SAg-specific unresponsiveness.

摘要

已知重复注射低剂量的细菌超抗原(SAg)可诱导特异性T细胞无反应性。我们在本研究中表明,长期接受葡萄球菌肠毒素B(SEB)的BALB/c小鼠脾脏中含有对SEB特异性初始T细胞反应发挥免疫调节功能的SEB特异性CD4(+) TCRBV8(+) T细胞。抑制作用影响IL-2和IFN-γ的分泌以及T细胞的增殖。然而,这些抑制细胞不同于最近在人和小鼠中描述的天然CD4(+) T调节细胞,因为它们不表达细胞表面CD25。它们是CD152(CTLA-4)阴性的,并且其调节活性与NF Foxp3的表达无关。相比之下,重复注射SEB后,CD4(+)CD25(+)脾细胞是异质性的,包含效应细胞和调节细胞。在体内,CD4(+)CD25(-) T调节细胞独立于CD4(+)CD25(+) T细胞预防SEB诱导的死亡。然而,在胸腺切除的CD25(+)细胞耗竭的小鼠中无法实现SEB诱导的耐受,因为重复注射SEB并不能避免这些动物发生致命的中毒性休克。总体而言,这些数据表明,虽然CD4(+)CD25(+) T调节细胞是诱导SAg诱导的耐受所必需的,但CD4(+)CD25(-) T细胞在SAg特异性无反应性的维持阶段发挥其调节活性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验