Tunik E, Poizner H, Levin M F, Adamovich S V, Messier J, Lamarre Y, Feldman A G
Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, 197 University Avenue, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
Exp Brain Res. 2003 Dec;153(3):343-55. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1576-4. Epub 2003 Sep 19.
During trunk-assisted reaching to targets placed within arm's length, the influence of trunk motion on the hand trajectory is compensated for by changes in the arm configuration. The role of proprioception in this compensation was investigated by analyzing the movements of 2 deafferented and 12 healthy subjects. Subjects reached to remembered targets (placed approximately 80 degrees ipsilateral or approximately 45 degrees contralateral to the sagittal midline) with an active forward movement of the trunk produced by hip flexion. In 40% of randomly selected trials, trunk motion was mechanically blocked. No visual feedback was provided during the experiment. The hand trajectory and velocity profiles of healthy subjects remained invariant whether or not the trunk was blocked. The invariance was achieved by changes in arm interjoint coordination that, for reaches toward the ipsilateral target, started as early as 50 ms after the perturbation. Both deafferented subjects exhibited considerable, though incomplete, compensation for the effects of the perturbation. Compensation was more successful for reaches to the ipsilateral target. Both deafferented subjects showed invariance between conditions (unobstructed or blocked trunk motion) in their hand paths to the ipsilateral target, and one did to the contralateral target. For the other deafferented subject, hand paths in the two types of trials began to deviate after about 50% into the movement, because of excessive elbow extension. In movements to the ipsilateral target, when deafferented subjects compensated successfully, the changes in arm joint angles were initiated as early as 50 ms after the trunk perturbation, similar to healthy subjects. Although the deafferented subjects showed less than ideal compensatory control, they compensated to a remarkably large extent given their complete loss of proprioception. The presence of partial compensation in the absence of vision and proprioception points to the likelihood that not only proprioception but also vestibulospinal pathways help mediate this compensation.
在通过躯干辅助够取手臂可及范围内的目标时,手臂构型的变化可补偿躯干运动对手部轨迹的影响。通过分析2名去传入神经受试者和12名健康受试者的运动,研究了本体感觉在这种补偿中的作用。受试者通过髋部屈曲产生的躯干主动向前运动,去够取记忆中的目标(放置在矢状中线同侧约80度或对侧约45度处)。在40%的随机选择试验中,躯干运动被机械阻挡。实验过程中未提供视觉反馈。无论躯干是否被阻挡,健康受试者的手部轨迹和速度曲线都保持不变。这种不变性是通过手臂关节间协调的变化实现的,对于够取同侧目标的动作,这种变化在扰动后50毫秒就开始了。两名去传入神经受试者都表现出了对扰动影响的相当程度(尽管不完全)的补偿。对同侧目标的够取动作补偿更成功。两名去传入神经受试者在到达同侧目标的手部路径上,在两种情况(无阻碍或躯干运动受阻)之间表现出不变性,其中一名受试者对侧目标的手部路径也表现出不变性。对于另一名去传入神经受试者,在两种类型试验中的手部路径在运动约50%后开始偏离,原因是肘部过度伸展。在向同侧目标的运动中,当去传入神经受试者成功补偿时,手臂关节角度的变化在躯干扰动后50毫秒就开始了,这与健康受试者相似。尽管去传入神经受试者表现出不太理想的补偿控制,但鉴于他们完全丧失本体感觉,他们的补偿程度相当大。在没有视觉和本体感觉的情况下存在部分补偿,这表明不仅本体感觉,而且前庭脊髓通路也可能有助于介导这种补偿。