Rossi Elena, Mitnitski Arnold, Feldman Anatol G
Neurological Science Research Center, Department of Physiology, University of Montreal and Research Center, Rehabilitation Institute of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3S 2J4.
J Physiol. 2002 Jan 15;538(Pt 2):659-71. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.012809.
When reaching towards objects placed outside the arm workspace, the trunk assumes an active role in transport of the hand by contributing to the extent of movement while simultaneously maintaining the direction of reach. We investigated the spatial-temporal aspects of the integration of the trunk motion into reaching. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that the efficiency ('gain') of the arm-trunk co-ordination determining the contribution of the trunk to the extent of hand movement may vary substantially with the phase of reaching. Sitting subjects made fast pointing movements towards ipsi- and a contralateral targets placed beyond the reach of the right arm so that a forward trunk motion was required to assist in transporting the hand to the target. Sight of the arm and target was blocked before the movement onset. In randomly selected trials, the trunk motion was unexpectedly prevented by an electromagnet. Subjects were instructed to make stereotypical movements whether or not the trunk was arrested. In non-perturbed trials, most subjects began to move the hand and trunk simultaneously. In trunk-blocked trials, it was impossible for the hand to cover the whole pointing distance but the hand trajectory and velocity profile initially matched those from the trials in which the trunk motion was free, approximately until the hand reached its peak velocity. The arm inter-joint co-ordination substantially changed in response to the trunk arrest at a minimal latency of 40 ms after the perturbation onset. The results suggest that when the trunk was free, the influence of the trunk motion on the hand trajectory and velocity profile was initially neutralized by appropriate changes in the arm joint angles. Only after the hand had reached its peak velocity did the trunk contribute to the extent of pointing. Previous studies suggested that the central commands underlying the transport component of arm movements are completed when the hand reaches peak velocity. These studies, together with the present finding that the trunk only begins to contribute to the hand displacement at peak hand velocity, imply that the central commands that determine the contributions of the arm and the trunk to the transport of the hand are generated sequentially, even though the arm and trunk move in parallel.
当伸手去够位于手臂工作空间之外的物体时,躯干通过在运动幅度上发挥作用,同时保持伸手方向,对手的移动起到积极作用。我们研究了躯干运动整合到伸手动作中的时空方面。具体而言,我们测试了这样一个假设,即决定躯干对手移动幅度贡献的手臂 - 躯干协调效率(“增益”)可能会随着伸手阶段的不同而有很大变化。坐着的受试者快速向位于右臂够不到范围之外的同侧和对侧目标进行指向动作,因此需要躯干向前运动来协助将手运送到目标。在运动开始前,手臂和目标的视野被遮挡。在随机选择的试验中,躯干运动会被电磁铁意外阻止。受试者被指示无论躯干是否被阻止,都要做出刻板的动作。在未受干扰的试验中,大多数受试者开始同时移动手和躯干。在躯干被阻止的试验中,手不可能覆盖整个指向距离,但手的轨迹和速度曲线最初与躯干运动自由的试验中的情况相匹配,大约直到手达到其峰值速度。在扰动开始后至少40毫秒的最短延迟时,手臂关节间的协调因躯干被阻止而发生了显著变化。结果表明,当躯干自由时,躯干运动对手轨迹和速度曲线的影响最初通过手臂关节角度的适当变化而被抵消。只有在手达到其峰值速度之后,躯干才对手的指向幅度做出贡献。先前的研究表明,当手达到峰值速度时,手臂运动的运输成分所依据的中枢指令就完成了。这些研究,连同当前发现的躯干仅在手部峰值速度时才开始对手部位移做出贡献这一结果,意味着决定手臂和躯干对手部运输贡献的中枢指令是依次产生的,尽管手臂和躯干是并行移动的。