Kuyvenhoven J D, Ham H R, Piepsz A
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire St. Pierre, Service des Radioisotopes, Rue Haute 290, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Nucl Med Commun. 2003 Oct;24(10):1097-103. doi: 10.1097/00006231-200310000-00010.
The aim of this study was to evaluate Rutland's method for the recovery of renal retention function without deconvolution. Renograms (n=5800) were generated by convolving 10 real input functions with 580 artificially created retention functions. Their ratios of minimal to mean transit time ranged from 0.1 to 1.0, and for mean transit time ranged from 3 to 60 min. The retention function was recovered from each renogram and its associated input function by calculating the first derivative of the residence time of the tracer in the kidney. Minimal, mean, and maximal transit time of the recovered retention function were calculated and compared with the original values. Qualitatively, the recovered retention function differed little from the original one. Quantitatively, values for recovered minimal transit time equalled original minimal transit time in all cases, whilst recovered mean transit time and maximal transit time equalled, respectively, the original mean transit time and maximal transit time if the original minimal to mean transit time ratio equalled 1. If this ratio was less than 1, recovered mean transit time was higher than original mean transit time and recovered maximal transit time was lower than original maximal transit time. For values of mean and maximal transit time, the differences from the original value increased with increasing original mean and maximal transit time, respectively, and with increasing renal clearance and decreasing minimal to mean transit time ratio. It is confirmed that Rutland's method is a particularly interesting alternative to deconvolution analysis. The errors that occur when recovering the retention function are relatively small.
