Peer review of manuscripts: theory and practice.
作者信息
Young Simon N
出版信息
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2003 Sep;28(5):327-30.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Peer review of manuscripts: theory and practice.稿件同行评审：理论与实践
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2003 Sep;28(5):327-30.
2
The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.神经科学同行评审联盟
Neurobiol Dis. 2009 Mar;33(3):313-4. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.01.009.
3
The neuroscience peer review consortium.神经科学同行评审联盟。
Brain Struct Funct. 2009 Sep;213(4-5):359-61. doi: 10.1007/s00429-009-0206-8.
4
The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.神经科学同行评审联盟
Neuroinformatics. 2009 Jun;7(2):89-91. doi: 10.1007/s12021-009-9044-3.
5
The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
Neurosci Lett. 2009 Jun 19;457(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.04.049.
6
The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.神经科学同行评审联盟
Exp Neurol. 2009 Mar;216(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.01.018.
7
[The visibility of the Latin American neurosciences].
Rev Neurol. 2007;44(9):576.
8
Peer review of manuscripts for biomedical journals.生物医学期刊稿件的同行评审。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1995 Jul 1;207(1):36-8.
9
[Electronic manuscripts: the periodicals earn money, the referees pay].
Lakartidningen. 2005;102(11):888.
引用本文的文献
1
Context-Aware Reviewer Assignment for Trust Enhanced Peer Review.用于增强信任的同行评审的上下文感知评审员分配
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 19;10(6):e0130493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130493. eCollection 2015.
2
Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience peer review process, with advice for authors.《精神病学与神经科学杂志》同行评审流程及给作者的建议。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2008 Jan;33(1):7-9.
3
Ethical conduct of journal editors.期刊编辑的道德行为。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2004 Sep;29(5):334-6.
本文引用的文献
1
Appealing to editors?
Lancet. 2003 Jun 7;361(9373):1926. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13602-1.
2
Scientific literacy: Clear as mud.科学素养：如泥沼般晦涩难懂。
Nature. 2003 May 22;423(6938):376-8. doi: 10.1038/423376a.
3
The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist.随机对照试验中方法学因素的报告以及与促进遵守《试验报告统一标准》（CONSORT）清单的期刊政策的关联。
Control Clin Trials. 2002 Aug;23(4):380-8. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(02)00214-3.
4
Reporting of informed consent and ethics committee approval in clinical trials.临床试验中知情同意和伦理委员会批准的报告。
JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2835-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2835.
5
Identifying manuscript reviewers: randomized comparison of asking first or just sending.确定稿件评审人：先询问还是直接发送的随机比较
JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2795-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2795.
6
Prodding tardy reviewers: a randomized comparison of telephone, fax, and e-mail.
JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2794-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2794.
7
Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction.作者对同行评审的看法：评审质量和录用情况对满意度的影响
JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2790-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2790.
8
Measuring the quality of editorial peer review.衡量编辑同行评审的质量。
JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2786-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2786.
9
Effect of written feedback by editors on quality of reviews: two randomized trials.编辑书面反馈对评审质量的影响：两项随机试验
JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2781-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2781.
10
Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do?低质量医学研究：期刊能做些什么？
JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2765-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2765.
Zotero 插件