Wildfeuer A, Zimmermann T, Eibel G, Lach P, Yeates R, Pfaff G
Pfizer/Mack Research and Development Laboratories, Illertissen, FRG.
J Int Med Res. 1992;20 Suppl 1:4A-11A.
The pharmacokinetics of both ampicillin and sulbactam obtained from a balanced, open two-way crossover study in 20 normal adult volunteers receiving a single 375 mg oral tablet of sultamicillin administered as two different formulations--the original product (Duocid) and a generic formulation that is commercially available in Turkey--were compared. Pharmacokinetic parameters for the two formulations and for both ampicillin and sulbactam were tested for bio-equivalence by the two one-sided Student's t-test (80-120% range; P < 0.1). Area under concentration--time curves and maximum concentrations for both components were found to be non-equivalent for the two formulations, the generic formulation having consistently lower mean values. The results were consistent with studies of the in vitro release of sultamicillin from the two tablets. It is concluded that the generic formulation is pharmacokinetically inferior to the original product.
在20名正常成年志愿者中进行了一项平衡、开放的双向交叉研究,比较了两种不同剂型(原研产品Duocid和土耳其市场上可买到的仿制药)的单次口服375mg舒他美西林片剂中氨苄西林和舒巴坦的药代动力学。通过双单侧t检验(80%-120%范围;P<0.1)对两种剂型以及氨苄西林和舒巴坦的药代动力学参数进行生物等效性测试。结果发现,两种剂型中两种成分的浓度-时间曲线下面积和最大浓度均不等效,仿制药的平均值始终较低。该结果与两种片剂中舒他美西林的体外释放研究一致。结论是,仿制药在药代动力学上劣于原研产品。