Suppr超能文献

垂直中线瘢痕是大鼠横行腹直肌肌皮瓣最大存活的一个“高危”因素。

A vertical midline scar is a 'high-risk' factor for maximum survival of the rat TRAM flap.

作者信息

Sano Kazufumi, Hallock Geoffrey G, Rice David C

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2003 Oct;51(4):403-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000067969.57450.CE.

Abstract

The presence of any abdominal scar, in addition to obesity, a smoking history, and prior irradiation are considered the major known "risk factors" for predictable success or failure of the lower transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap. For many, a vertical midline scar has even been considered to be a relative contraindication. The possibility that the scar instead could effect some form of delay or by neovascularization permit reperfusion across the midline might negate this concern. The validity of this hypothesis was tested in 40 Sprague-Dawley (CD) rats using our standard rat TRAM flap model. Every rat initially had a vertical skin incision made from xiphoid to pubis. At a second stage, either immediately or after a delay of 1 week, 2 weeks, or 6 months, a superior-pedicled (dominant) or inferior-pedicled (nondominant) TRAM flap was raised, with five rats in each subgroup. For the inferior-pedicled group, the percentage of ipsilateral (muscle-pedicle half) flap survival approached 75% and had a trend toward greater survival with each increase in the time of delay, but any difference was not statistically significant (F= 0.653, P = 0.538). In the superior-pedicled group, the ipsilateral half of the flap always survived completely. In both groups, the contralateral or opposite side always underwent complete necrosis regardless of pedicle orientation or time constraints. The midline scar did not enhance even unilateral TRAM flap survival when compared with historic controls, and long-term transmidline reperfusion across the scar did not seem to occur. These findings corroborate the clinical observation that only a unilateral TRAM flap would be reliable in the presence of a vertical midline abdominal scar.

摘要

除肥胖、吸烟史和既往放疗外,任何腹部瘢痕的存在都被视为下腹直肌肌皮瓣(TRAM)可预测成败的主要已知“风险因素”。对许多人来说,垂直中线瘢痕甚至被视为相对禁忌证。然而,瘢痕反而可能通过某种形式的延迟或新生血管形成实现中线再灌注,这种可能性可能会消除这一担忧。我们使用标准大鼠TRAM皮瓣模型,在40只Sprague-Dawley(CD)大鼠中对这一假设的有效性进行了测试。每只大鼠最初都有一个从剑突到耻骨的垂直皮肤切口。在第二阶段,立即或在延迟1周、2周或6个月后,掀起一个上蒂(主要)或下蒂(非主要)TRAM皮瓣,每个亚组有5只大鼠。在下蒂组中,同侧(肌肉蒂侧)皮瓣存活百分比接近75%,并且随着延迟时间的每次增加有存活增加的趋势,但任何差异均无统计学意义(F = 0.653,P = 0.538)。在上蒂组中,皮瓣的同侧部分总是完全存活。在两组中,无论蒂的方向或时间限制如何,对侧总是发生完全坏死。与历史对照相比,中线瘢痕即使对单侧TRAM皮瓣存活也没有促进作用,而且似乎没有发生穿过瘢痕的长期中线再灌注。这些发现证实了临床观察结果,即在存在垂直中线腹部瘢痕的情况下,只有单侧TRAM皮瓣是可靠的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验