Suppr超能文献

利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗新生儿已知或疑似耐药革兰氏阳性菌感染的疗效比较

Linezolid versus vancomycin in the treatment of known or suspected resistant gram-positive infections in neonates.

作者信息

Deville Jaime G, Adler Stuart, Azimi Parvin H, Jantausch Barbara A, Morfin Maria Rayo, Beltran Sandra, Edge-Padbury Barbara, Naberhuis-Stehouwer Sharon, Bruss Jon B

机构信息

UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003 Sep;22(9 Suppl):S158-63. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000086955.93702.c7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gram-positive infections caused by susceptible and resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci and enterococci are increasing problems in neonates. Linezolid, a new oxazolidinone, is active against these pathogens and has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating Gram-positive infections in pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous and oral linezolid with vancomycin (10 to 15 mg/kg every 6 to 24 h) in neonates (age 0 to 90 days).

METHODS

Hospitalized infants with known or suspected hospital-acquired pneumonia, complicated skin or skin structure infections, bacteremia or other infections (e.g. pyelonephritis, abdominal abscess) were eligible. Test-of-cure clinical response was evaluated at follow-up.

RESULTS

Sixty-three neonates, randomized 2:1 to linezolid (n = 43) or vancomycin (n = 20) were included in the intent-to-treat group. Clinical cure rates at follow-up in the intent-to-treat group were higher, but not significantly different, for linezolid vs. vancomycin (78% vs. 61%; P = 0.196). Corresponding cure rates in clinically evaluable patients were 84% vs. 77% (P = 0.553) for linezolid and vancomycin, respectively. Pathogen eradication rates were as follows in the linezolid and vancomycin groups, respectively: S. aureus (67% vs. 60%; P = 0.850); coagulase-negative staphylococci (88% vs. 100%; P = 0.379); and enterococci (71% vs. 0%; P = 0.168). Results for hematology and chemistry assays were similar between treatment groups. Fewer linezolid-treated neonates had drug-related adverse events than vancomycin-treated neonates (12% vs. 32%; P = 0.058).

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid is well-tolerated and as effective as vancomycin in the treatment of resistant Gram-positive infections in neonates.

摘要

背景

由金黄色葡萄球菌、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌和肠球菌的敏感及耐药菌株引起的革兰氏阳性菌感染,在新生儿中成为日益严重的问题。利奈唑胺是一种新型恶唑烷酮类药物,对这些病原体具有活性,最近已被美国食品药品监督管理局批准用于治疗儿科患者的革兰氏阳性菌感染。

目的

比较静脉和口服利奈唑胺与万古霉素(每6至24小时10至15毫克/千克)在0至90日龄新生儿中的临床疗效和安全性。

方法

符合条件的是患有已知或疑似医院获得性肺炎、复杂皮肤或皮肤结构感染、菌血症或其他感染(如肾盂肾炎、腹腔脓肿)的住院婴儿。在随访时评估治疗结束时的临床反应。

结果

在意向性治疗组中,63例新生儿按2:1随机分组,分别接受利奈唑胺(n = 43)或万古霉素(n = 20)治疗。在意向性治疗组中,随访时利奈唑胺组的临床治愈率高于万古霉素组,但差异无统计学意义(78%对61%;P = 0.196)。在可进行临床评估的患者中,利奈唑胺和万古霉素的相应治愈率分别为84%对77%(P = 0.553)。利奈唑胺组和万古霉素组的病原体清除率分别如下:金黄色葡萄球菌(67%对60%;P = 0.850);凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(88%对100%;P = 0.379);肠球菌(71%对0%;P = 0.168)。治疗组之间血液学和化学分析结果相似。接受利奈唑胺治疗的新生儿发生药物相关不良事件的比例低于接受万古霉素治疗的新生儿(12%对32%;P = 0.058)。

结论

利奈唑胺耐受性良好,在治疗新生儿耐药革兰氏阳性菌感染方面与万古霉素疗效相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验