Carmona Francisco, Cristóbal Pilar, Casamitjana Roser, Balasch Juan
Institut Clnic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Hospital Clnic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;189(2):447-52. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00487-3.
Tubal ligation may reduce the ovarian blood flow and lead to tissue damage to the ovary. If so, this may also result in a significant decrease of the total follicular pool. We performed a long-term evaluation of ovarian reserve and function after tubal sterilization in a longitudinal prospective comparison cohort.
In an university tertiary-care center, 26 women undergoing laparoscopic tubal sterilization with the use of bipolar coagulation, and 26 matched control subjects underwent measurement of follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, 17beta-estradiol, and inhibin on menstrual cycle day 3 before (baseline) and at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 60 months after the sterilization for ovarian reserve evaluation. At baseline and 12 and 24 months after tubal ligation, women who underwent sterilization were sampled every other day across an entire menstrual cycle for follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, 17beta-estradiol, inhibin, and progesterone determination to evaluate ovarian function.
No significant changes were observed either within or between groups for any parameter, despite the fact that a 45% and 30% increase in follicle-stimulating hormone concentration from baseline to the 60-month control was detected in tubal sterilization and control groups of women, respectively. No significant changes were observed in the mean area under the curve of follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol, inhibin, and progesterone per menstrual cycle at baseline and 12 and 24 months after sterilization.
This 5-year follow-up study suggests that there is neither an accelerated decline of ovarian follicular reserve nor ovarian dysfunction after tubal sterilization by electrocoagulation.
输卵管结扎可能会减少卵巢血流并导致卵巢组织损伤。如果是这样,这也可能导致卵泡总数显著减少。我们在一个纵向前瞻性比较队列中对输卵管绝育术后的卵巢储备和功能进行了长期评估。
在一所大学三级医疗中心,26名接受双极电凝腹腔镜输卵管绝育术的女性和26名匹配的对照受试者在绝育术前(基线)以及术后6、12、18、24和60个月测量促卵泡激素、促黄体生成素、17β-雌二醇和抑制素,以评估卵巢储备。在基线以及输卵管结扎术后12个月和24个月,接受绝育术的女性在整个月经周期每隔一天采样一次,检测促卵泡激素、促黄体生成素、17β-雌二醇、抑制素和孕酮,以评估卵巢功能。
尽管在输卵管绝育组和对照组女性中分别检测到促卵泡激素浓度从基线到60个月时分别增加了45%和30%,但两组内和组间的任何参数均未观察到显著变化。在基线以及绝育术后12个月和24个月,每个月经周期促卵泡激素、促黄体生成素、雌二醇、抑制素和孕酮曲线下的平均面积均未观察到显著变化。
这项为期5年的随访研究表明,电凝输卵管绝育术后既没有卵巢卵泡储备加速下降,也没有卵巢功能障碍。