Waugh Russell F
Edith Cowan University, School of Education, Pearson Street, Churchlands, WA 6018, Australia.
J Appl Meas. 2003;4(4):370-85.
Coping with academic difficulties at a university was based on six aspects: Motivation and Planning, Friends and Planning, Studying and Planning, Emotions, Spiritual Help and Coping by Doing Nothing. Stem-items for each aspect were conceptually ordered by difficulty. Each of the stem-items was answered from three perspectives, Good Coping Strategies, Actual Coping Strategies, and Stress Reduction Strategies. The three response categories were No, not on any occasion this semester; Yes, on 1 to 3 occasions this semester, and Yes, on 4 or more occasions this semester. The convenience sample was 337 students studying education at an Australian university and data were analysed with a Rasch measurement model. A scale was created in which the difficulties of the items were ordered from easy to hard and the student measures of Coping were ordered from low to high. Coping by Doing Nothing and Using Spiritual Help stem-items didn't fit the measurement model and were deleted. This left an effective item sample of 21 (7 stem-items times 3). The proportion of observed student variance considered true was 0.88. The results supported the theory behind the construct of Coping as using Motivation and Planning, Friends and Planning, Studying and Planning, and Emotions, in which Expected Good Coping Strategies are easier than Actual Coping Strategies which, in turn, are easier than Stress Reducing Coping Strategies.
动机与规划、朋友与规划、学习与规划、情绪、精神支持以及无所作为式应对。每个方面的主干项目按照难度进行了概念排序。每个主干项目都从三个角度进行回答:良好应对策略、实际应对策略以及减压策略。三个回答类别分别是:否,本学期任何情况下都没有;是,本学期有1至3次;是,本学期有4次或更多次。便利样本为澳大利亚一所大学的337名教育学专业学生,数据采用拉施测量模型进行分析。创建了一个量表,其中项目的难度从易到难排序,学生的应对测量值从低到高排序。无所作为式应对和利用精神支持的主干项目不符合测量模型,被删除。这留下了一个由21个有效项目组成的样本(7个主干项目乘以3)。观察到的学生方差中被视为真实的比例为0.88。结果支持了应对这一概念背后的理论,即通过动机与规划、朋友与规划、学习与规划以及情绪来应对,其中预期的良好应对策略比实际应对策略更容易,而实际应对策略又比减压应对策略更容易。