Suppr超能文献

穿透性创伤的陷阱。

Pitfalls in penetrating trauma.

作者信息

van Vugt A B

机构信息

Department of Traumatology and Emergency Care, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Chir Belg. 2003 Aug;103(4):358-63. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2003.11679444.

Abstract

In Western Europe the most frequent cause of multiple injuries is blunt trauma. Only few of us have experience with penetrating trauma, without exception far less than in the USA or South-Africa. In Rotterdam, the Erasmus Medical Centre is a level I trauma centre, situated directly in the town centre. All penetrating traumas are directly presented to our emergency department by a well organized ambulance service supported by a mobile medical team if necessary. The delay with scoop and run principles is very short for these cases, resulting in severely injured reaching the hospital alive in increasing frequency. Although the basic principles of trauma care according to the guidelines of the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) (1-2) are the same for blunt and penetrating trauma with regard to priorities, diagnostics and primary therapy, there are some pitfalls in the strategy of management in penetrating trauma one should be aware of. Simple algorithms can be helpful, especially in case of limited experience (3). In case of life-saving procedures, the principles of Damage Control Surgery (DCS) must be followed (4-5). This approach is somewhat different from "traditional" surgical treatment. In the Ist phase prompt interventions by emergency thoracotomy and laparotomy are carried out, with only two goals to achieve: surgical control of haemorrhage and contamination. After temporary life-saving procedures, the 2nd phase is characterized by intensive care treatment, dealing with hypothermia, metabolic acidosis and clotting disturbances. Finally in the 3rd phase, within 6-24 hours, definitive surgical care takes place. In this overview, penetrating injuries of neck, thorax, abdomen and extremities will be outlined. Penetrating cranial injuries, as a neurosurgical emergency with poor prognosis, are not discussed. History and physical examination remain the corner stones of good medical praxis. In a work-up according to ATLS principles airway, breathing and circulation should be evaluated with great care. Neurovascular examination related to trauma of the spinal cord, peripheral nerves as well as vascular involvement should be carried out also in extremity injuries. Physical examination should be completed by localization of all stabwounds, in- and outshot openings as well as recto-vaginal examination and inspection of the oropharynx.

摘要

在西欧,多发伤最常见的原因是钝性创伤。我们中只有少数人有处理穿透伤的经验,无一例外,远远少于美国或南非。在鹿特丹,伊拉斯姆斯医学中心是一级创伤中心,位于市中心。所有穿透伤均由组织完善的救护车服务直接送至我们的急诊科,必要时由移动医疗团队提供支持。对于这些病例,采用快速搬运原则时延误时间非常短,使得重伤患者存活到达医院的频率越来越高。尽管按照高级创伤生命支持(ATLS)指南(1 - 2),钝性创伤和穿透伤在创伤救治的基本原则方面,如优先事项、诊断和初始治疗是相同的,但在穿透伤的管理策略中存在一些应予以注意的陷阱。简单的算法可能会有所帮助,尤其是在经验有限的情况下(3)。在进行挽救生命的手术时,必须遵循损伤控制外科(DCS)的原则(4 - 5)。这种方法与“传统”手术治疗有所不同。在第一阶段,通过紧急开胸和剖腹手术进行迅速干预,仅要实现两个目标:手术控制出血和污染。在进行临时挽救生命的手术后,第二阶段以重症监护治疗为特征,处理体温过低、代谢性酸中毒和凝血紊乱。最后在第三阶段,在6 - 24小时内进行确定性手术治疗。在本综述中,将概述颈部、胸部、腹部和四肢的穿透伤。由于穿透性颅脑损伤是一种预后不良的神经外科急症,故不予讨论。病史和体格检查仍然是良好医疗实践的基石。在按照ATLS原则进行的检查中,应极其仔细地评估气道、呼吸和循环。在四肢损伤中,还应进行与脊髓、周围神经创伤以及血管受累相关的神经血管检查。体格检查应通过定位所有刺伤、进出伤口以及直肠阴道检查和口咽部检查来完成。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验