• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众代表的个人想法:辅助死亡、自愿安乐死与政治家

Private thoughts of public representatives: assisted death, voluntary euthanasia and politicians.

作者信息

Willmott Lindy, White Ben

机构信息

Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology.

出版信息

J Law Med. 2003 Aug;11(1):77-92.

PMID:14526728
Abstract

Assisted death and voluntary euthanasia have received significant and sustained media attention in recent years. High-profile cases of people seeking assistance to end their lives have raised, at least in the popular press, debate about whether individuals should be able to seek such assistance at a time when they consider their suffering to be unbearable or their quality of life unsatisfactory. Other recent developments include a number of attempts to legislate on the issue by the minor parties in Australia and the successful enactment of legislation in a few overseas jurisdictions. However, despite all of the recent attention that has focused on assisted death and voluntary euthanasia, a discussion of the adequacy of existing laws has not made it onto the political agenda of any of the Australian State or Territory governments. This is in spite of the fact that the private views of the majority of our elected Members of Parliament may be supportive of reform. This article explores the role of politicians' views and, as a case study, considers the opinions expressed by a number of Queensland Members of Parliament. In light of the views of these politicians and those of members of the public, as well as considerations arising from current medical practice, the article argues that there is a need for open political debate on assisted death and voluntary euthanasia. The article also suggests ways that such a debate may be achieved while minimising any political impact on governments that are prepared at least to consider this issue.

摘要

近年来,协助死亡和自愿安乐死受到了媒体的广泛且持续的关注。备受瞩目的人们寻求帮助结束生命的案例,至少在大众媒体上引发了关于个人在认为自己的痛苦无法忍受或生活质量不尽人意时是否应该能够寻求此类帮助的辩论。近期的其他进展包括澳大利亚一些小党派就该问题进行立法的多次尝试,以及一些海外司法管辖区成功颁布相关法律。然而,尽管近期所有的关注都聚焦在协助死亡和自愿安乐死上,但对现有法律是否充分的讨论却尚未进入澳大利亚任何州或领地政府的政治议程。尽管事实上我们大多数当选议员的个人观点可能支持改革,但情况依然如此。本文探讨了政治家观点的作用,并作为一个案例研究,考量了一些昆士兰议员表达的意见。鉴于这些政治家以及公众的观点,再结合当前医疗实践中出现的各种因素,本文认为有必要就协助死亡和自愿安乐死展开公开的政治辩论。本文还提出了实现此类辩论的方法,同时将对至少愿意考虑这个问题的政府产生的任何政治影响降至最低。

相似文献

1
Private thoughts of public representatives: assisted death, voluntary euthanasia and politicians.公众代表的个人想法:辅助死亡、自愿安乐死与政治家
J Law Med. 2003 Aug;11(1):77-92.
2
How should Australia regulate voluntary euthanasia and assisted suicide?澳大利亚应如何规范自愿安乐死和协助自杀?
J Law Med. 2012 Dec;20(2):410-38.
3
Euthanasia and assisted suicide in the post-Rodriguez era: lessons from foreign jurisdictions.罗德里格斯案后时代的安乐死与协助自杀:外国司法辖区的经验教训
Osgoode Hall Law J. 2000 Winter;38(4):591-641.
4
Autonomy and death.自主性与死亡。
Tulane Law Rev. 1996 Nov;71(1):45-137.
5
Avoiding a fate worse than death: an argument for legalising voluntary physician-based euthanasia.避免比死亡更糟糕的命运:支持基于医生协助的自愿安乐死合法化的理由。
J Law Med. 2012 Sep;20(1):184-203.
6
German nurses, euthanasia and terminal care: a personal perspective.德国护士、安乐死与临终关怀:个人视角
Nurs Ethics. 2009 Mar;16(2):231-7. doi: 10.1177/0969733008100368.
7
[Euthanasia: the law, a few notions and the question of assisted suicide].[安乐死:法律、一些概念及协助自杀问题]
Rev Med Brux. 2008 Sep;29(4):423-8.
8
Direct democracy and bioethical choices: voting life and death at the ballot box.直接民主与生物伦理选择:在投票箱前决定生死
Univ Mich J Law Reform. 1995 Summer;28(4):799-859.
9
The limitations of the Dutch concept of euthanasia.荷兰安乐死概念的局限性。
Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth. 2003 Jan;13(1):20-6.
10
Australia's Northern Territory: the first jurisdiction to legislate voluntary euthanasia, and the first to repeal it.澳大利亚北领地:第一个对自愿安乐死进行立法的司法管辖区,也是第一个废除该立法的地区。
DePaul J Health Care Law. 1997 Spring;1(3):645-53.

引用本文的文献

1
The acceptability among lay persons and health professionals of actively ending the lives of damaged newborns.普通民众和医疗专业人员对于主动结束受损新生儿生命的可接受性。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2010 Sep;29(2):14.1-24. doi: 10.1007/BF03351524.