• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单极电凝术与传统内镜治疗高危消化性溃疡出血的前瞻性随机研究

Monopolar coagulation versus conventional endoscopic treatment for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective, randomized study.

作者信息

Soon Maw-Soan, Wu Shun-Sheng, Chen Yang-Yuan, Fan Chuan-Sang, Lin Otto S

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, ChangHua Christian Medical Center, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Sep;58(3):323-9.

PMID:14528202
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severe upper GI hemorrhage from an actively bleeding peptic ulcer is sometimes difficult to treat by conventional endoscopic means, such as multipolar electrocoagulation, heat probe coagulation, and injection therapy. It was hypothesized that monopolar coagulation with a "hot biopsy" forceps may be more effective in such cases.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized trial was performed to assess the safety and short-term efficacy of monopolar coagulation versus conventional treatment (combination heat probe coagulation and injection therapy) in the treatment of patients with various types of actively bleeding or high-risk ulcers.

RESULTS

Primary hemostasis was achieved in 54 of 56 actively bleeding patients in the monopolar coagulation group. In contrast, primary hemostasis was achieved in 33 of 43 patients in the control group (p = 0.003), with 8 of the remaining 10 being treated successfully by crossover monopolar coagulation. During 30-day follow-up, bleeding recurred in 6 patients in the conventional therapy group versus none in the monopolar coagulation group (p = 0.012). Post-endoscopy blood transfusion requirements were lower in the monopolar coagulation group. Mortality and surgery rates were zero in both groups. There was no procedure-related complication.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated improved primary hemostasis and a reduced short-term rate of recurrent bleeding for patients with actively bleeding and high-risk non-bleeding peptic ulcers treated by monopolar coagulation. The complication rate associated with monopolar coagulation was low.

摘要

背景

活动性出血的消化性溃疡所致严重上消化道出血有时难以通过常规内镜手段治疗,如多极电凝、热探头凝固和注射治疗。据推测,使用“热活检”钳进行单极凝固在这类病例中可能更有效。

方法

进行了一项前瞻性随机试验,以评估单极凝固与传统治疗(热探头凝固和注射治疗联合)在治疗各类活动性出血或高危溃疡患者中的安全性和短期疗效。

结果

单极凝固组56例活动性出血患者中有54例实现了初步止血。相比之下,对照组43例患者中有33例实现了初步止血(p = 0.003),其余10例中有8例通过交叉单极凝固成功治疗。在30天随访期间,传统治疗组有6例患者再次出血,而单极凝固组无再次出血病例(p = 0.012)。单极凝固组内镜检查后的输血需求较低。两组的死亡率和手术率均为零。没有与操作相关的并发症。

结论

本研究表明,对于接受单极凝固治疗的活动性出血和高危非出血性消化性溃疡患者,初步止血效果更好,短期再出血率降低。与单极凝固相关的并发症发生率较低。

相似文献

1
Monopolar coagulation versus conventional endoscopic treatment for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective, randomized study.单极电凝术与传统内镜治疗高危消化性溃疡出血的前瞻性随机研究
Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Sep;58(3):323-9.
2
A Randomized Trial of Monopolar Soft-mode Coagulation Versus Heater Probe Thermocoagulation for Peptic Ulcer Bleeding.单极软模式凝血与热探头热凝治疗消化性溃疡出血的随机试验
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul;49(6):472-6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000190.
3
Monopolar soft-mode coagulation using hemostatic forceps for peptic ulcer bleeding.使用止血钳进行单极软模式凝固治疗消化性溃疡出血。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Nov-Dec;61(136):2272-6.
4
Effect of programmed endoscopic follow-up examinations on the rebleeding rate of gastric or duodenal peptic ulcers treated by injection therapy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.内镜定期随访检查对注射疗法治疗的胃或十二指肠消化性溃疡再出血率的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Endoscopy. 1998 Sep;30(7):583-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1001360.
5
Randomized controlled trial comparing epinephrine injection plus heat probe coagulation versus epinephrine injection plus argon plasma coagulation for bleeding peptic ulcers.比较肾上腺素注射联合热探头凝固术与肾上腺素注射联合氩离子凝固术治疗消化性溃疡出血的随机对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Apr;57(4):455-61. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)80008-1.
6
Endoscopic hemostasis of bleeding peptic ulcers.
Dig Dis. 1993 Jul-Oct;11(4-5):216-27. doi: 10.1159/000171414.
7
Combined epinephrine and bipolar probe coagulation vs. bipolar probe coagulation alone for bleeding peptic ulcer: a randomized, controlled trial.肾上腺素联合双极探头凝血与单纯双极探头凝血治疗消化性溃疡出血的随机对照试验
Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Dec;60(6):910-5. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02232-1.
8
Retrospective multicenter study concerning electrocautery forceps with soft coagulation for nonmalignant gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding in Japan.在日本,针对非恶性胃十二指肠溃疡出血,使用具有软凝功能的电烙止血钳的回顾性多中心研究。
Dig Endosc. 2010 Jul;22 Suppl 1:S15-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2010.00962.x.
9
A prospective, randomized comparison of 10-Fr versus 7-Fr bipolar electrocoagulation catheter in combination with adrenaline injection in the endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers.10 Fr与7 Fr双极电凝导管联合肾上腺素注射在内镜下治疗消化性溃疡出血中的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Oct;98(10):2192-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07691.x.
10
Comparison of monopolar hemostatic forceps with soft coagulation versus hemoclip for peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial (with video).单极止血夹联合电凝与钛夹治疗消化性溃疡出血的随机对照试验(附视频)
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Apr;89(4):792-802. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety of endoscopic procedures with monopolar versus bipolar instruments in an ex vivo porcine model.在体外猪模型中使用单极与双极器械进行内镜手术的安全性。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-1176-9.
2
Predictors of re-bleeding after endoscopic hemostasis for delayed post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding.内镜下括约肌切开术后延迟出血内镜止血后再出血的预测因素。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar 21;22(11):3196-201. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i11.3196.
3
Endoscopic therapy for peptic ulcer hemorrhage: practice variations in a multi-center U.S. consortium.
内镜治疗消化性溃疡出血:美国多中心联盟中的实践差异。
Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Sep;55(9):2568-76. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1311-5. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
4
Treating delayed endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced bleeding: epinephrine injection with or without thermotherapy.治疗延迟性内镜下括约肌切开术诱导出血:肾上腺素注射联合或不联合热疗。
World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Oct 14;15(38):4823-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4823.