Suppr超能文献

实验组和对照组改善情况的解释。

Explanations for improvement in both experimental and control groups.

作者信息

Becker Heather, Roberts Greg, Voelmeck Wayne

机构信息

University of Texas, Austin School of Nursing, USA.

出版信息

West J Nurs Res. 2003 Oct;25(6):746-55. doi: 10.1177/0193945903253002.

Abstract

A true experimental design with random assignment to groups protects against false causal inferences that could be made when both the treatment and control groups change because of factors such as testing effects, reactivity, contamination, maturation, history, and other measurement effects. The occurrence of these phenomena, however, provides interesting information about factors affecting health care attitudes, knowledge, and behavior change, which can interfere with a nursing study's ability to demonstrate an experimental effect. In this article, we discuss these design threats, illustrate them with examples from recent health research, and suggest strategies for decreasing them in clinical nursing studies.

摘要

真正的实验设计,即随机分组,可防止因测试效应、反应性、污染、成熟度、历史因素及其他测量效应等因素导致治疗组和对照组均发生变化时做出错误的因果推断。然而,这些现象的出现提供了有关影响医疗保健态度、知识和行为改变的因素的有趣信息,这些因素可能会干扰护理研究证明实验效果的能力。在本文中,我们将讨论这些设计威胁,通过近期健康研究的实例进行说明,并提出在临床护理研究中减少这些威胁的策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验