• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实验组和对照组改善情况的解释。

Explanations for improvement in both experimental and control groups.

作者信息

Becker Heather, Roberts Greg, Voelmeck Wayne

机构信息

University of Texas, Austin School of Nursing, USA.

出版信息

West J Nurs Res. 2003 Oct;25(6):746-55. doi: 10.1177/0193945903253002.

DOI:10.1177/0193945903253002
PMID:14528620
Abstract

A true experimental design with random assignment to groups protects against false causal inferences that could be made when both the treatment and control groups change because of factors such as testing effects, reactivity, contamination, maturation, history, and other measurement effects. The occurrence of these phenomena, however, provides interesting information about factors affecting health care attitudes, knowledge, and behavior change, which can interfere with a nursing study's ability to demonstrate an experimental effect. In this article, we discuss these design threats, illustrate them with examples from recent health research, and suggest strategies for decreasing them in clinical nursing studies.

摘要

真正的实验设计,即随机分组,可防止因测试效应、反应性、污染、成熟度、历史因素及其他测量效应等因素导致治疗组和对照组均发生变化时做出错误的因果推断。然而,这些现象的出现提供了有关影响医疗保健态度、知识和行为改变的因素的有趣信息,这些因素可能会干扰护理研究证明实验效果的能力。在本文中,我们将讨论这些设计威胁,通过近期健康研究的实例进行说明,并提出在临床护理研究中减少这些威胁的策略。

相似文献

1
Explanations for improvement in both experimental and control groups.实验组和对照组改善情况的解释。
West J Nurs Res. 2003 Oct;25(6):746-55. doi: 10.1177/0193945903253002.
2
Two-group experimental designs.
West J Nurs Res. 2003 Oct;25(6):619-22. doi: 10.1177/0193945903255662.
3
The importance of preservation of the ethical principle of equipoise in the design of clinical trials: relative impact of the methodological quality domains on the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials.在临床试验设计中保持均衡伦理原则的重要性:方法学质量领域对随机对照试验治疗效果的相对影响
Account Res. 2003 Oct-Dec;10(4):301-15. doi: 10.1080/714906103.
4
On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.关于随机试验中信息偏倚和混杂偏倚的因果结构。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Dec;15(6):1214-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01347.x.
5
Risk factors, confounding, and the illusion of statistical control.风险因素、混杂因素与统计控制的错觉
Psychosom Med. 2004 Nov-Dec;66(6):868-75. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000140008.70959.41.
6
Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches.通过潜在结果探讨临床和流行病学研究中的因果效应:概念与分析方法
Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:121-45. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.121.
7
Understanding research: 1. Methodologies used to answer research questions.理解研究:1. 用于回答研究问题的方法。
J Wound Care. 2001 Jul;10(7):269-72. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2001.10.7.26102.
8
Clinical trial design for orthodontists.正畸医生的临床试验设计
J Orthod. 2013 Jun;40(2):93-103. doi: 10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000048.
9
Limitations of randomized clinical trials in chronic diseases: explanations and recommendations.慢性病随机临床试验的局限性:解释与建议。
Adv Mind Body Med. 2002 Winter;18(2):14-21.
10
Influence of treatment preferences on validity: a review.治疗偏好对效度的影响:一项综述。
Can J Nurs Res. 2009 Dec;41(4):52-67.

引用本文的文献

1
Removing environmental barriers to independent living: A feasibility randomised controlled trial targeting people ageing with long-term physical disabilities.消除独立生活的环境障碍:一项针对长期身体残疾老年人的可行性随机对照试验。
Br J Occup Ther. 2025 Jan;88(1):5-16. doi: 10.1177/03080226241280803. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
Effectiveness of internet-delivered dialectical behavior therapy skills training on executive functions among college students with borderline personality traits: a non-randomized controlled trial.互联网提供的辩证行为疗法技能训练对具有边缘型人格特质大学生执行功能的有效性:一项非随机对照试验。
Res Psychother. 2023 Oct 30;26(3):694. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2023.694.
3
Sustainability of effects and secondary long-term outcomes: One-year follow-up of a cluster-randomized controlled trial to prevent maltreatment in institutional care.
效果的可持续性及二次长期结果:一项预防机构照料中虐待行为的整群随机对照试验的一年随访
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 May 20;2(5):e0000286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000286. eCollection 2022.
4
Can mat Pilates and belly dance be effective in improving body image, self-esteem, and sexual function in patients undergoing hormonal treatment for breast cancer? A randomized clinical trial.普拉提和肚皮舞能否有效改善接受乳腺癌激素治疗患者的身体意象、自尊和性功能?一项随机临床试验。
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2023 Apr;26(2):141-151. doi: 10.1007/s00737-023-01294-4. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
5
The effect of a hand hygiene intervention on the behaviour, practices and health of parents of preschool children in South Africa.南非一项手部卫生干预对学龄前儿童家长行为、习惯和健康的影响。
Perspect Public Health. 2022 Nov;142(6):338-346. doi: 10.1177/17579139221123404. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
6
Effectiveness of profile by Sanford behavioral weight loss program for weight loss following endometrial cancer treatment.桑福德行为减肥计划对子宫内膜癌治疗后体重减轻的效果。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2021 Nov 26;38:100897. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100897. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Effects of a Modified Tap Dance Program on Ankle Function and Postural Control in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.改良踢踏舞方案对老年人踝关节功能和姿势控制的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 12;18(12):6379. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126379.
8
Diabetes management intervention studies: lessons learned from two studies.糖尿病管理干预研究:两项研究的经验教训。
Trials. 2021 Jan 18;22(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-05017-3.
9
The use of patient-reported outcomes to detect adverse events in metastatic melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy: a randomized controlled pilot trial.利用患者报告的结局来检测接受免疫治疗的转移性黑色素瘤患者的不良事件:一项随机对照试验。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Oct 30;4(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00255-0.
10
Effects of an Individualized Active Aging Counseling Intervention on Mobility and Physical Activity: Secondary Analyses of a Randomized Controlled Trial.个体化积极老龄化咨询干预对活动能力和身体活动的影响:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
J Aging Health. 2020 Dec;32(10):1316-1324. doi: 10.1177/0898264320924258. Epub 2020 Jun 10.