Wenzel A, Verdonschot E H, Truin G J, König K G
Department of Oral Radiology, Royal Dental College, Aarhus, Denmark.
J Dent Res. 1992 Dec;71(12):1934-7. doi: 10.1177/00220345920710121501.
Occlusal caries lesions may progress into the dentin without this resulting in a macroscopic breakdown of the enamel surface. Imaging methods may therefore be needed to aid in the visual detection of occlusal caries. It was the aim of this study to evaluate diagnostic accuracy in a laboratory set-up of visual inspection (VI), fiber-optic-transillumination (FOTI), conventional radiography (CR), and two digital radiographic image modalities (DRm and DRr) for detection of occlusal caries in clinically non-cavitated teeth. Eighty-one extracted third molars from 18-20-year-old males were assessed by four observers on a five-rank confidence scale by the five methods. Ground sections (500-600 microns) served as validation for true state of disease: 1 = no caries in dentin, 2 = caries just beyond dentino-enamel junction, or 3 = deep dentinal caries, halfway or more to the pulp. ROC analysis was performed on the basis of the confidence rank scale data on two diagnostic thresholds, T1 = caries in dentin (disease state 2+3) and T2 = caries deep in dentin (state 3). On the T1 level, use of the FOTI method gave on average the most accurate diagnosis, closely followed by VI, both performing better than use of radiography. On the T2 level, all five diagnostic methods performed equally well.
咬合面龋损可能进展至牙本质,而釉质表面却未出现肉眼可见的破坏。因此,可能需要借助影像学方法来辅助目视检测咬合面龋。本研究旨在评估在实验室环境下,目视检查(VI)、光纤透照法(FOTI)、传统X线摄影(CR)以及两种数字X线影像模式(DRm和DRr)对临床未形成龋洞牙齿的咬合面龋进行检测时的诊断准确性。18至20岁男性的81颗拔除的第三磨牙由四名观察者采用这五种方法按照五级置信度进行评估。磨片(500 - 600微米)用作疾病真实状态的验证标准:1 = 牙本质无龋,2 = 龋损刚超过牙本质 - 釉质界,或3 = 深龋,达牙髓一半或更深。基于两个诊断阈值的置信度等级量表数据进行ROC分析,T1 = 牙本质龋(疾病状态2 + 3),T2 = 牙本质深层龋(状态3)。在T1水平上,使用FOTI方法平均诊断准确性最高,其次是VI,两者均优于X线摄影。在T2水平上,所有五种诊断方法表现相当。