DeBry Ronald W
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Box 210006, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0006, USA.
Syst Biol. 2003 Oct;52(5):604-17. doi: 10.1080/10635150390235403.
Homoplasy among morphological characters has hindered inference of higher level rodent phylogeny for over 100 years. Initial molecular studies, based primarily on single genes, likewise produced little resolution of the deep relationships among rodent families. Two recent molecular studies (Huchon et al., 2002, Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:1053-1065; Adkins et al., 2003, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 26:409-420), using larger samples from the nuclear genome, have produced phylogenies that are generally concordant with each other, but many of the deep superfamilial nodes were still lacking substantial statistical support. Data are presented here for a total of approximately 3,600 base pairs from portions of three different nuclear protein-coding genes, CB1, IRBP, and RAG2, from 19 rodents and three outgroups. Separate analyses, with data partitioned according to both genes and codon position, produced conflicting results. Trees obtained from all partitions of CB1 and RAG2 and those obtained from the first- plus second-position sites of IRBP were generally concordant with each other and the trees from the two recent studies, whereas trees obtained from the third-position sites of IRBP were not. Although the IRBP third-position sites represent only 1/9 of the total data set, combined analyses using either parsimony or likelihood resulted in trees in agreement with the IRBP third-position sites and in disagreement with the remaining 8/9 of the sites from this data set and the two recent multigene studies. In contrast, maximum-likelihood analysis using a site-specific rates model did recover a tree that is highly congruent with the trees in the two recent studies. If the IRBP third-position sites are removed from the current data set, then combined likelihood analyses obtain a tree that is highly congruent with those of the two recent studies. This analysis also provides, for the first time in a study of rodent phylogeny, robust statistical support for every bipartition, with just one exception. This tree divides rodents into two major clades. The first contains Myodonta (Muroidea plus Dipodidae) and the only unresolved trichotomy, from which descend Geomyoidea, Pedetidae, and Castoridae. On the other side of the root is a clade containing Sciuroidea plus Gliridae, and Hystricognathi. Some uncertainty remains on the placement of the root. Trees on which the Hystricognathi are the basal sister group to Myodonta, Geomyoidea, Pedetidae, and Castoridae are also found within a Bayesian 95% credible set, as estimated by Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling.
形态特征中的同塑性阻碍了高级啮齿动物系统发育的推断达100多年之久。最初主要基于单基因的分子研究同样未能很好地解析啮齿动物科之间的深层关系。最近的两项分子研究(Huchon等人,2002年,《分子生物学与进化》19:1053 - 1065;Adkins等人,2003年,《分子系统发育与进化》26:409 - 420),使用了来自核基因组的更大样本,得出的系统发育树总体上相互一致,但许多深层的超科节点仍缺乏充分的统计支持。本文展示了来自19种啮齿动物和3个外类群的三个不同核蛋白编码基因CB1、IRBP和RAG2部分的总共约3600个碱基对的数据。根据基因和密码子位置进行数据划分的单独分析得出了相互矛盾的结果。从CB1和RAG2的所有划分得到的树以及从IRBP的第一和第二位点得到的树总体上相互一致,也与最近两项研究的树一致,而从IRBP的第三位点得到的树则不然。尽管IRBP第三位点仅占总数据集的1/9,但使用简约法或似然法的联合分析得出的树与IRBP第三位点一致,与该数据集其余8/9的位点以及最近两项多基因研究不一致。相比之下,使用位点特异性速率模型的最大似然分析确实得到了一棵与最近两项研究的树高度一致的树。如果从当前数据集中去除IRBP第三位点,那么联合似然分析得到的树与最近两项研究的树高度一致。该分析还首次在啮齿动物系统发育研究中为除一个例外的每个二分法提供了有力的统计支持。这棵树将啮齿动物分为两个主要分支。第一个分支包含鼠形亚目(鼠总科加跳鼠科)以及唯一未解决的三分法,从该三分法中分出囊鼠总科、鳞尾松鼠科和河狸科。在根部的另一侧是一个包含松鼠总科加睡鼠科以及豪猪亚目的分支。根部的位置仍存在一些不确定性。通过Metropolis耦合马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗抽样估计,豪猪亚目是鼠形亚目、囊鼠总科、鳞尾松鼠科和河狸科的基部姐妹群的树也在贝叶斯95%可信集中被发现。