Pérez-Losada Marcos, Høeg Jens T, Crandall Keith A
Department of Integrative Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602-5181, USA.
Syst Biol. 2004 Apr;53(2):244-64. doi: 10.1080/10635150490423458.
The Thoracica includes the ordinary barnacles found along the sea shore and is the most diverse and well-studied superorder of Cirripedia. However, although the literature abounds with scenarios explaining the evolution of these barnacles, very few studies have attempted to test these hypotheses in a phylogenetic context. The few attempts at phylogenetic analyses have suffered from a lack of phylogenetic signal and small numbers of taxa. We collected DNA sequences from the nuclear 18S, 28S, and histone H3 genes and the mitochondrial 12S and 16S genes (4,871 bp total) and data for 37 adult and 53 larval morphological characters from 43 taxa representing all the extant thoracican suborders (except the monospecific Brachylepadomorpha). Four Rhizocephala (highly modified parasitic barnacles) taxa and a Rhizocephala + Acrothoracica (burrowing barnacles) hypothetical ancestor were used as the outgroup for the molecular and morphological analyses, respectively. We analyzed these data separately and combined using maximum likelihood (ML) under "hill-climbing" and genetic algorithm heuristic searches, maximum parsimony procedures, and Bayesian inference coupled with Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques under mixed and homogeneous models of nucleotide substitution. The resulting phylogenetic trees answered key questions in barnacle evolution. The four-plated Iblomorpha were shown as the most primitive thoracican, and the plateless Heteralepadomorpha were placed as the sister group of the Lepadomorpha. These relationships suggest for the first time in an invertebrate that exoskeleton biomineralization may have evolved from phosphatic to calcitic. Sessilia (nonpedunculate) barnacles were depicted as monophyletic and appear to have evolved from a stalked (pedunculate) multiplated (5+) scalpelloidlike ancestor rather than a five-plated lepadomorphan ancestor. The Balanomorpha (symmetric sessile barnacles) appear to have the following relationship: (Chthamaloidea(Coronuloidea(Tetraclitoidea, Balanoidea))). Thoracican divergence times were estimated under ML-based local clock, Bayesian, and penalized likelihood approaches using an 18S data set and three calibration points: Heteralepadomorpha = 530 million years ago (MYA), Scalpellomorpha = 340 MYA, and Verrucomorpha = 120 MYA. Estimated dates varied considerably within and between approaches depending on the calibration point. Highly parameterized local clock models that assume independent rates (r > or = 15) for confamilial or congeneric species generated the most congruent estimates among calibrations and agreed more closely with the barnacle fossil record. Reasonable estimates were also obtained under the Bayesian procedure of Kishino et al. (2001, Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:352-361) but using multiple calibrations. Most of the dates estimated under the Bayesian procedure of Aris-Brosou and Yang (2002, Syst. Biol. 51:703-714) and the penalized likelihood method using single and/or multiple calibrations were inconsistent among calibrations and did not fit the fossil record.
蔓足亚纲包括在海岸发现的常见藤壶,是蔓足纲中最多样化且研究最深入的总目。然而,尽管文献中有大量解释这些藤壶进化的设想,但很少有研究试图在系统发育背景下验证这些假说。少数系统发育分析尝试存在缺乏系统发育信号和分类单元数量少的问题。我们从核18S、28S和组蛋白H3基因以及线粒体12S和16S基因中收集了DNA序列(总共4871碱基对),并从代表所有现存蔓足亚目(除单种的短茗荷亚目外)的43个分类单元中获取了37个成体和53个幼虫形态特征的数据。分别选取4个根头目(高度特化的寄生藤壶)分类单元和一个根头目 + 尖胸藤壶亚目(穴居藤壶)假想祖先作为分子和形态分析的外类群。我们分别对这些数据进行分析,并使用“爬山”和遗传算法启发式搜索下的最大似然法(ML)、最大简约法以及结合马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗技术的贝叶斯推断,在核苷酸替换的混合和同质模型下进行合并分析。所得的系统发育树回答了藤壶进化中的关键问题。四板类茗荷被证明是最原始的蔓足亚目,无板类异茗荷亚目被置于茗荷亚目的姐妹群位置。这些关系首次在无脊椎动物中表明,外骨骼生物矿化可能已从磷酸钙形式进化为碳酸钙形式。无柄蔓足类藤壶被描绘为单系类群,似乎是从有柄(具柄)的多板(5块以上)类似鳞甲类的祖先而非五板类茗荷祖先进化而来。龟藤壶亚目(对称无柄藤壶)似乎具有以下关系:(小藤壶总科(龟藤壶总科(四齿藤壶总科,藤壶总科)))。使用18S数据集和三个校准点:异茗荷亚目 = 5.3亿年前(MYA)、鳞甲类 = 3.4亿年前、围胸目 = 1.2亿年前,在基于ML的局部时钟、贝叶斯和惩罚似然法下估计蔓足亚目的分歧时间。根据校准点的不同,估计日期在不同方法之间以及方法内部差异很大。假设同科或同属物种具有独立速率(r≥15)的高度参数化局部时钟模型在校准之间产生了最一致的估计,并且与藤壶化石记录更为吻合。在Kishino等人(2001年,《分子生物学与进化》18:352 - 361)的贝叶斯程序下,但使用多个校准也获得了合理的估计。在Aris - Brosou和Yang(2002年,《系统生物学》51:703 - 714)的贝叶斯程序以及使用单个和/或多个校准的惩罚似然法下估计的大多数日期在校准之间不一致,并且不符合化石记录。