Harris Jeffrey P, Weisman Michael H, Derebery Jennifer M, Espeland Mark A, Gantz Bruce J, Gulya A Julianna, Hammerschlag Paul E, Hannley Maureen, Hughes Gordon B, Moscicki Richard, Nelson Ralph A, Niparko John K, Rauch Steven D, Telian Steven A, Brookhouser Patrick E
Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA 92103-8895, USA.
JAMA. 2003 Oct 8;290(14):1875-83. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.14.1875.
A number of therapies have been proposed for the long-term management of corticosteroid-responsive, rapidly progressive, bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (autoimmune inner ear disease [AIED]). Methotrexate has emerged as the benchmark agent but has not been rigorously evaluated for hearing improvement in patients with AIED.
To assess the efficacy of long-term methotrexate in maintaining hearing improvements achieved with glucocorticoid (prednisone) therapy in patients with AIED.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted from February 3, 1998, to November 5, 2001, of 67 patients with rapidly progressive, bilateral sensorineural hearing loss at 10 tertiary care centers in the United States.
Randomization to either oral methotrexate (15 to 20 mg/wk; n = 33) or placebo (n = 34), in combination with an 18-week prednisone taper. Follow-up examinations, including audiometric evaluation, were performed at 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 52 weeks, or until hearing loss was documented.
Maintenance of hearing improvement achieved from prednisone treatment.
Sixty-seven patients (57.8%) enrolled in the prednisone challenge experienced hearing improvement. Twenty-five patients (37%) experienced hearing improvements in both ears. Of the individuals who reached study end points, 24 (80%) of 30 end points were because of measured hearing loss in the methotrexate group and 29 (93.5%) of 31 end points were because of measured hearing loss in the placebo group (P =.15). Methotrexate was no more effective than placebo in maintaining the hearing improvement achieved with prednisone treatment (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-2.17; P =.30).
Methotrexate does not appear to be effective in maintaining the hearing improvement achieved with prednisone therapy in patients with AIED.
对于皮质类固醇反应性、快速进展性双侧感音神经性听力损失(自身免疫性内耳疾病[AIED])的长期管理,已经提出了多种治疗方法。甲氨蝶呤已成为基准药物,但尚未对AIED患者的听力改善情况进行严格评估。
评估长期使用甲氨蝶呤对AIED患者维持糖皮质激素(泼尼松)治疗所取得的听力改善效果。
设计、地点和参与者:1998年2月3日至2001年11月5日在美国10个三级医疗中心对67例快速进展性双侧感音神经性听力损失患者进行的一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
随机分为口服甲氨蝶呤(15至20毫克/周;n = 33)或安慰剂(n = 34),同时进行为期18周的泼尼松逐渐减量治疗。在第4、8、12、24、36、48和52周进行随访检查,包括听力测定评估,或直至记录到听力损失。
维持泼尼松治疗所取得的听力改善。
参与泼尼松激发试验的67例患者(57.8%)听力得到改善。25例患者(37%)双耳听力得到改善。在达到研究终点的个体中,甲氨蝶呤组30个终点中有24个(80%)是由于测量到的听力损失,安慰剂组31个终点中有29个(93.5%)是由于测量到的听力损失(P = 0.15)。在维持泼尼松治疗所取得的听力改善方面,甲氨蝶呤并不比安慰剂更有效(风险比,1.31;95%置信区间,0.79 - 2.17;P = 0.30)。
对于AIED患者,甲氨蝶呤似乎无法有效维持泼尼松治疗所取得的听力改善。