Lottes Ilsa L, Adkins Charles W
University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA.
J Sex Res. 2003 Aug;40(3):286-95. doi: 10.1080/00224490309552193.
The purpose of this paper is to report the findings of an attempt to construct and examine the psychometric properties of an instrument that measures support for the 11 sexual rights formulated by the World Association of Sexology. Since international conferences held in the mid-1990s, a new approach to sexual issues has been promoted by health professionals, sex educators, and human rights advocates. This approach emphasizes the empowerment of individuals and examines sexual health concerns within a human rights framework. Goals of a sexual rights approach have been to promote awareness and advocacy of sexual issues and especially to facilitate the work toward better sex education and sexual health services. Analysis of reliability and validity data from two university samples (n = 388 and n = 175) indicated that the majority of the sexual rights scales have acceptable psychometric properties. This paper concludes with a discussion of ways to improve the scales for future use and the need to validate the scales using samples that allow generalizability of findings.
本文旨在报告一项尝试的结果,该尝试旨在构建并检验一种测量对世界性学协会制定的11项性权利支持程度的工具的心理测量特性。自20世纪90年代中期召开国际会议以来,健康专业人员、性教育工作者和人权倡导者推动了一种处理性问题的新方法。这种方法强调个人赋权,并在人权框架内审视性健康问题。性权利方法的目标一直是提高对性问题的认识并进行宣传,特别是促进更好的性教育和性健康服务方面的工作。对来自两个大学样本(n = 388和n = 175)的信度和效度数据的分析表明,大多数性权利量表具有可接受的心理测量特性。本文最后讨论了改进量表以供未来使用的方法,以及使用能够使研究结果具有普遍性的样本对量表进行验证的必要性。