• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法医鉴定患者的治疗:公立精神病医院的作用不断扩大。

Treatment of forensic patients: an expanding role for public psychiatric hospitals.

作者信息

Linhorst D M, Turner M A

机构信息

School of Social Service, St. Louis University, 3550 Lindell Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA.

出版信息

Health Soc Work. 1999 Feb;24(1):18-26. doi: 10.1093/hsw/24.1.18.

DOI:10.1093/hsw/24.1.18
PMID:14533416
Abstract

This article explores the increased role of state-operated public psychiatric hospitals in treating forensic patients. Patients with a forensic legal status have a mental illness and are involved with the criminal justice system. Using data from Missouri's forensic system, the article compares the characteristics of voluntary hospital patients with those of the largest hospitalized group of forensic patients--those found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI). Overall, NGRI patients tended to be higher functioning, less likely to have committed assaultive acts, and more likely to have substance abuse and personality disorder diagnoses. The article explores the treatment needs of forensic patients who reside in public psychiatric hospitals and discusses the effect of the strong presence of forensic patients in public psychiatric hospitals on social work practice, including clinical work with forensic patients, social work administration, and social work advocacy.

摘要

本文探讨了国有公立精神病医院在治疗法医鉴定患者方面日益增加的作用。具有法医法律身份的患者患有精神疾病且与刑事司法系统有关联。本文利用密苏里州法医系统的数据,将自愿住院患者的特征与最大的法医鉴定住院患者群体——因精神错乱而被判无罪(NGRI)的患者的特征进行了比较。总体而言,因精神错乱而被判无罪的患者功能往往更高,实施攻击性行为的可能性较小,更有可能被诊断为药物滥用和人格障碍。本文探讨了住在公立精神病医院的法医鉴定患者的治疗需求,并讨论了法医鉴定患者在公立精神病医院的大量存在对社会工作实践的影响,包括与法医鉴定患者的临床工作、社会工作管理以及社会工作宣传。

相似文献

1
Treatment of forensic patients: an expanding role for public psychiatric hospitals.法医鉴定患者的治疗:公立精神病医院的作用不断扩大。
Health Soc Work. 1999 Feb;24(1):18-26. doi: 10.1093/hsw/24.1.18.
2
Assaultive behavior in state psychiatric hospitals: differences between forensic and nonforensic patients.州立精神病医院中的攻击行为:法医鉴定患者与非法医鉴定患者之间的差异。
J Interpers Violence. 2004 Aug;19(8):857-74. doi: 10.1177/0886260504266883.
3
The importance of the patients deemed not guilty by reason of insanity for the psychiatric reform.因精神错乱而被判定无罪的患者对精神病学改革的重要性。
Psychiatriki. 2016 Jul-Sep;27(3):165-168. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2016.273.165.
4
Forensic psychiatric assessment and treatment in Germany. Legal framework, recent developments, and current practice.德国的法医精神病学评估与治疗。法律框架、近期发展及当前实践。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2000 Sep-Dec;23(5-6):467-80. doi: 10.1016/s0160-2527(00)00056-x.
5
The impact of system design on the characteristics of Missouri's insanity acquittees.系统设计对密苏里州因精神错乱而宣判无罪者特征的影响。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1997;25(4):509-29.
6
[Closing forensic psychiatric hospitals in Italy: a new deal for mental health care?].[意大利关闭法医精神病医院:精神卫生保健的新举措?]
Riv Psichiatr. 2015 Sep-Oct;50(5):199-209. doi: 10.1708/2040.22158.
7
Insanity defenses: contested or conceded?精神错乱抗辩:抗辩还是承认?
Am J Psychiatry. 1984 Jul;141(7):885-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.141.7.885.
8
Insane Sex Offenders: Psychiatric and Legal Characteristics of Sexual Offenders Found Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity.精神错乱的性犯罪者:因精神错乱而被判无罪的性犯罪者的精神病学和法律特征
J Forensic Sci. 2018 Jul;63(4):1207-1214. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13707. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
9
Not guilty by reason of insanity of murder: clinical and neuropsychological characteristics.因谋杀罪精神错乱而无罪:临床及神经心理学特征
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1997;25(2):161-71.
10
Examining violence among Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity state hospital inpatients across multiple time points: the roles of criminogenic risk factors and psychiatric symptoms.多时间点考察因精神错乱而无罪的州立医院住院患者中的暴力行为:犯罪风险因素和精神症状的作用。
CNS Spectr. 2020 Oct;25(5):714-722. doi: 10.1017/S1092852919001809. Epub 2020 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Does transinstitutionalization explain the overrepresentation of people with serious mental illnesses in the criminal justice system?跨机构安置是否解释了严重精神疾病患者在刑事司法系统中过度代表的现象?
Community Ment Health J. 2011 Dec;47(6):716-22. doi: 10.1007/s10597-011-9420-y. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
2
The involvement of a consumer council in organizational decision making in a public psychiatric hospital.消费者委员会参与公立精神病医院的组织决策。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2001 Nov;28(4):427-38. doi: 10.1007/BF02287773.