• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于DNA序列推断的双形属(假叶目:舌形科)的分类地位

The taxonomic status of Digramma (Pseudophyllidea: Ligulidae) inferred from DNA sequences.

作者信息

Li Jingjing, Liao Xianghua

机构信息

Ichthyology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Parasitol. 2003 Aug;89(4):792-9. doi: 10.1645/GE-3078.

DOI:10.1645/GE-3078
PMID:14533692
Abstract

The traditional classification of the ligulid tapeworms into 2 genera, Ligula Bloch, 1782 and Digramma Cholodkovsky, 1914, remains controversial. Molecular data of sequences for the 5' end of the nuclear 28S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene, the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, and the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase subunit 1 (ND1) gene, as well as the first internal transcribed spacer (ITS1) of the nuclear ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), were used to characterize Digramma and to investigate its relationship with Ligula. Digramma spp. exhibited identical sequences with Ligula intestinalis both in the 28S rRNA and the COI gene and differed from L. intestinalis by 0.7% in the ITS1 region and 7.4% in the ND1 gene, respectively. A high degree of genetic conservation within 28S ribosomal DNA, COI, ITS1, and even ND1 genes, was found in Ligula and Digramma. The low genetic divergence in the 4 genes between Ligula and Digramma indicates that Digramma is probably not an independent genus. Therefore, it is proposed that Ligula and Digramma should be considered as 2 species within the genus Ligula and the tapeworms of Digramma collected from diverse localities in China belong to the same species. The present study also suggests that ITS1 and ND1 sequences can act as useful genetic markers to distinguish Ligula and Digramma.

摘要

将舌状绦虫传统分类为2个属,即1782年的舌状属(Ligula Bloch)和1914年的双型属(Digramma Cholodkovsky),仍然存在争议。利用核糖体核糖核酸(rRNA)基因核28S 5′端、线粒体细胞色素c氧化酶亚基I(COI)基因、烟酰胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸脱氢酶亚基1(ND1)基因的序列分子数据,以及核糖体脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)的第一个内部转录间隔区(ITS1),对双型属进行特征描述,并研究其与舌状属的关系。双型属物种在28S rRNA和COI基因中与肠舌状绦虫(Ligula intestinalis)表现出相同的序列,在ITS1区域与肠舌状绦虫分别相差0.7%,在ND1基因中相差7.4%。在舌状属和双型属中发现28S核糖体DNA、COI、ITS1甚至ND1基因内都有高度的遗传保守性。舌状属和双型属之间4个基因的低遗传差异表明双型属可能不是一个独立的属。因此,建议将舌状属和双型属视为舌状属内的2个物种,并且从中国不同地区采集的双型属绦虫属于同一物种。本研究还表明,ITS1和ND1序列可作为区分舌状属和双型属的有用遗传标记。

相似文献

1
The taxonomic status of Digramma (Pseudophyllidea: Ligulidae) inferred from DNA sequences.基于DNA序列推断的双形属(假叶目:舌形科)的分类地位
J Parasitol. 2003 Aug;89(4):792-9. doi: 10.1645/GE-3078.
2
Is the genus Digramma synonymous to the genus Ligula (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea)? Evidence from ITS and 5' end 28S rDNA sequences.双形属(Digramma)与舌状属(Ligula,绦虫纲:假叶目)同义吗?来自内转录间隔区(ITS)和28S核糖体DNA(rDNA)5'端序列的证据。
Parasitol Res. 2003 Mar;89(5):419-21. doi: 10.1007/s00436-002-0802-5. Epub 2003 Jan 8.
3
The phylogeny of diphyllobothriid tapeworms (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) based on ITS-2 rDNA sequences.基于ITS-2 rDNA序列的双叶槽绦虫(绦虫纲:假叶目)系统发育研究
Parasitol Res. 2004 Sep;94(1):10-5. doi: 10.1007/s00436-004-1164-y. Epub 2004 Jul 27.
4
A paraphyly of the genus Bothriocephalus Rudolphi, 1808 (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) inferred from internal transcribed spacer-2 and 18S ribosomal DNA sequences.基于内部转录间隔区2和18S核糖体DNA序列推断1808年鲁道夫绦虫属(扁形动物门:假叶目)的并系性
J Parasitol. 2004 Jun;90(3):612-7. doi: 10.1645/GE-3302.
5
Phylogenetic analysis on genera of Corallobothriinae (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea) from North American ictalurid fishes, using partial sequences of the 28s ribosomal gene.利用28s核糖体基因的部分序列对北美鲶鱼科鱼类的珊瑚双叶绦虫亚科(绦虫纲:原头科)各属进行系统发育分析。
J Parasitol. 2004 Oct;90(5):1123-7. doi: 10.1645/GE-268R.
6
Comparative mitogenomics supports synonymy of the genera Ligula and Digramma (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidae).比较线粒体基因组学支持 Ligula 和 Digramma 属(绦虫:双槽科)的同义。
Parasit Vectors. 2018 May 30;11(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2910-9.
7
Taxonomic status of Choanoscolex lamothei García-Prieto, 1990 (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea) using morphological and molecular evidence.基于形态学和分子证据对1990年加西亚 - 普列托描述的拉莫特氏海绵头绦虫(扁形动物门:原头科)的分类地位研究
J Parasitol. 2003 Dec;89(6):1212-9. doi: 10.1645/GE-3151.
8
Taxonomic status of the Japanese triploid forms of Fasciola: comparison of mitochondrial ND1 and COI sequences with F. hepatica and F. gigantica.日本三倍体片形吸虫的分类地位:线粒体ND1和COI序列与肝片形吸虫和巨片形吸虫的比较
J Parasitol. 1998 Apr;84(2):445-8.
9
Redescription of Corallobothrium solidum (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea) and erection of a new genus, Essexiella, for tapeworms from channel catfishes (Ictaluridae).坚固珊瑚绦虫(扁形动物门:原头科)的重新描述以及为来自沟鲶(鲇科)的绦虫建立新属——埃塞克斯绦虫属
J Parasitol. 2011 Dec;97(6):1142-51. doi: 10.1645/GE-2705.1. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
10
Geography and host specificity: two forces behind the genetic structure of the freshwater fish parasite Ligula intestinalis (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidae).地理分布与宿主特异性:淡水鱼寄生虫舌状绦虫(绦虫纲:双叶槽绦虫科)遗传结构背后的两种驱动力
Int J Parasitol. 2008 Oct;38(12):1465-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.03.008. Epub 2008 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Sequence and Haplotype Analyses of Ligula intestinalis in Acanthobrama marmid (Cyprinidae) in Turkey.土耳其的 Marmid 麦穗鱼(鲤科)中 Ligula intestinalis 的序列和单倍型分析。
Acta Parasitol. 2024 Mar;69(1):453-464. doi: 10.1007/s11686-023-00762-2. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
2
Infection Status with Plerocercoid of Ligulid Tapeworm in Cyprinid Fish from Three Lakes in Republic of Korea.韩国三个湖泊鲤科鱼类中舌状绦虫裂头蚴的感染状况
Helminthologia. 2018 Jul 28;55(3):251-255. doi: 10.2478/helm-2018-0012. eCollection 2018 Sep.
3
The Taxonomic Position and Phylogenetic Relationship between and Based on Morphological and Molecular Diagnosis.
基于形态学和分子诊断的[具体物种A]与[具体物种B]之间的分类地位和系统发育关系
Iran J Parasitol. 2018 Oct-Dec;13(4):648-654.
4
Comparative mitogenomics supports synonymy of the genera Ligula and Digramma (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidae).比较线粒体基因组学支持 Ligula 和 Digramma 属(绦虫:双槽科)的同义。
Parasit Vectors. 2018 May 30;11(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2910-9.