• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大即美:20世纪80年代至2001年挪威大型医院的电子病历

Big is beautiful: electronic patient records in large Norwegian hospitals 1980s-2001.

作者信息

Ellingsen G, Monteiro E

机构信息

University Hospital of Northern Norway, 9038 Breivika, Norway.

出版信息

Methods Inf Med. 2003;42(4):366-70.

PMID:14534635
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This paper aims to describe and analyze the prolonged efforts - spanning close to two decades - of developing and using electronic patient records in the large, university-based hospitals in Norway.

METHODS

This study belongs to an interpretative approach to the development and use of information systems.

RESULTS

The increase in organizational, institutional, political and technological complexity has been seriously underestimated. This paper describes and analyses the prolonged efforts - spanning close to two decades - of developing and using EPRs in the large, university-based hospitals in Norway. The investments involved were considerable, implying that a crucial aspect of these efforts has been the way alliances have been forged with public institutions and agendas.

CONCLUSIONS

The conditions for small-scale, bottom-up and evolutionary approaches never succeeded in constructing themselves as a viable alternative to the larger, more sweeping electronic patient record initiative, reiterating a more general tendency to privilege the more comprehensive and daring projects.

摘要

目标

本文旨在描述和分析挪威大型大学附属医院在近二十年时间里开发和使用电子病历的长期努力。

方法

本研究属于对信息系统开发和使用的解释性方法。

结果

组织、机构、政治和技术复杂性的增加被严重低估了。本文描述并分析了挪威大型大学附属医院在近二十年时间里开发和使用电子病历的长期努力。所涉及的投资相当可观,这意味着这些努力的一个关键方面是与公共机构和议程建立联盟的方式。

结论

小规模、自下而上和渐进式方法的条件从未成功构建起一种可行的替代方案,以取代规模更大、范围更广的电子病历计划,这再次凸显了一种更普遍的倾向,即更倾向于选择更全面、更大胆的项目。

相似文献

1
Big is beautiful: electronic patient records in large Norwegian hospitals 1980s-2001.大即美:20世纪80年代至2001年挪威大型医院的电子病历
Methods Inf Med. 2003;42(4):366-70.
2
Integrating health information systems: a critical appraisal.整合健康信息系统:一项批判性评估。
Methods Inf Med. 2003;42(4):428-32.
3
Clinical information system implementation. Challenges across two merged hospitals.
Comput Nurs. 2000 Jul-Aug;18(4):157-61.
4
Adding it up. Implementing an EMR is one thing, documenting the financials along the way is another.总计一下。实施电子病历系统是一回事,在此过程中记录财务情况则是另一回事。
Healthc Inform. 2007 Sep;24(9):48-9.
5
EDMS: what it was, is, and could be.电子文档管理系统:它的过去、现状与未来发展潜力
Top Health Inf Manage. 2002 Aug;23(1):42-51.
6
Square pegs in round holes: information systems, hospitals and the significance of contextual awareness.圆孔中的方榫:信息系统、医院与情境意识的重要性。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Feb;68(3):519-25. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.005. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
7
Web-access to a central medical record to improve cooperation between hospital and referring physicians.通过网络访问中央医疗记录以改善医院与转诊医生之间的合作。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;93:145-53.
8
Supporting the Saudi e-health initiative: the Master of Health Informatics programme at KSAU-HS.支持沙特电子健康计划:沙特国王健康科学大学健康信息学硕士项目。
East Mediterr Health J. 2010 Jan;16(1):119-24.
9
Getting from A to C: lifecycle lessons for e-health deployment.
Int J Electron Healthc. 2004;1(2):127-38. doi: 10.1504/IJEH.2004.005858.
10
Community hospital successfully implements eRecord and CPOE.社区医院成功实施电子病历和临床医嘱录入系统。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2006 Nov-Dec;24(6):307-16. doi: 10.1097/00024665-200611000-00004.

引用本文的文献

1
Policy context and digital development: a comparative study of trajectories in 4 Canadian academic health centers over 30 years.政策背景与数字发展:对4家加拿大学术健康中心30年发展轨迹的比较研究
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Aug 1;32(8):1286-1298. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf077.
2
Exploring adaptive mirroring in healthcare IT architectures.探索医疗保健信息技术架构中的自适应镜像
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2023 Feb 24;13(2):109-120. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2023.2182238. eCollection 2024.
3
The Norwegian National Summary Care Record: a qualitative analysis of doctors' use of and trust in shared patient information.
挪威国家综合医疗记录:对医生使用共享患者信息及信任度的定性分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 6;18(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3069-y.
4
Web-based interventions for behavior change and self-management: potential, pitfalls, and progress.基于网络的行为改变与自我管理干预措施:潜力、陷阱与进展
Med 2 0. 2012 Aug 14;1(2):e3. doi: 10.2196/med20.1741. eCollection 2012 Jul-Dec.
5
Developing electronic cooperation tools: a case from norwegian health care.开发电子合作工具:来自挪威医疗保健领域的一个案例
Interact J Med Res. 2013 Jun 19;2(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.2346.
6
Diffusion of Electronic Health Records and electronic communication in Norway.挪威的电子健康记录和电子通信的扩散。
Appl Clin Inform. 2011 Sep 7;2(3):355-64. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2011-01-IE-0008. Print 2011.
7
The e-Health Implementation Toolkit: qualitative evaluation across four European countries.电子健康实施工具包:在四个欧洲国家的定性评估。
Implement Sci. 2011 Nov 19;6:122. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-122.
8
Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: a systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method.电子病历研究中的紧张局势和悖论:使用元叙述方法的系统文献回顾。
Milbank Q. 2009 Dec;87(4):729-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00578.x.
9
No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record.无纸质病历,但流程依旧:对挪威两家停用纸质病历医院的体验进行定性探索
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Jan 10;8:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-2.