Cabral Rebecca J, Posner Samuel F, Macaluso Maurizio, Artz Lynn M, Johnson Christopher, Pulley LeaVonne
Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, (MS K-34), 4770 Buford Highway, NE, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Women Health. 2003;38(1):37-52. doi: 10.1300/J013v38n01_03.
This study assessed hypotheses that measures of power and control over male condom (MC) use would predict use of the female condom (FC) among women with main partners from two public STD clinics (n = 616). The women (mean age 24 years, 87% African American) were enrolled in an intervention study to promote barrier contraceptive use and were interviewed at baseline and at 6 monthly follow-up visits. Seven baseline predictor variables were assessed: her having requested MC use, his having objected, her having wanted a MC used but not asking, percentage of MC use, perceived control over MC use, anticipated consequences of refusing unprotected sex, and physical violence. In the first Poisson regression analysis, none of the hypothesized predictors was significantly associated with FC use during follow up. In the second regression analysis, which assessed the influence of the hypothesized set of predictors on follow-up FC use in situations when MCs were not used, we found two effects. Either no or inconsistent MC use before study entry was associated with less subsequent FC use; women who reported, at study entry, having more control over MC use were more likely to use FCs during follow up. We found no evidence of adoption of the FC by women in relationships marked by history of conflict over the MC, circumstances in which alternatives are most needed. On the contrary, we found that women with a history of control and consistent use of MCs were the most likely users of FCs when MCs were not used.
本研究评估了一些假设,即对男用避孕套(MC)使用的权力和控制措施能否预测来自两家公共性传播疾病诊所(n = 616)的有固定性伴侣的女性使用女用避孕套(FC)的情况。这些女性(平均年龄24岁,87%为非裔美国人)参与了一项促进屏障避孕方法使用的干预研究,并在基线期以及每6个月的随访时接受访谈。评估了7个基线预测变量:她曾要求使用MC、他曾表示反对、她想要使用MC但未提出要求、MC的使用比例、对MC使用的感知控制、拒绝无保护性行为的预期后果以及身体暴力。在第一次泊松回归分析中,没有一个假设的预测因素与随访期间FC的使用显著相关。在第二次回归分析中,评估了假设的预测因素集对未使用MC情况下随访FC使用的影响,我们发现了两种效应。研究开始前MC使用情况为无或不一致与后续FC使用较少相关;在研究开始时报告对MC使用有更多控制权的女性在随访期间更有可能使用FC。我们没有发现证据表明在因MC使用存在冲突历史的关系中(最需要替代方法的情况)女性会采用FC。相反,我们发现有控制和持续使用MC历史的女性在未使用MC时最有可能使用FC。