Corin W J, George D T, Sink J D, Santamore W P
Philadelphia Heart Institute, Presbyterian Medical Center, PA 19104.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992 Dec;104(6):1662-71.
In patients with congestive heart failure, medical treatment has a high rate of mortality and morbidity, and transplantation is limited by the availability of donor hearts. Dynamic cardiomyoplasty is being investigated as surgical therapy to improve left ventricular function in these patients. To evaluate the early postoperative effects of this procedure on left ventricular diastolic function, we studied seven dogs through the use of sonomicrometry and micromanometry in a canine model of dynamic cardiomyoplasty. Left ventricular diastolic parameters were determined before wrapping the latissimus dorsi muscle (baseline), after latissimus dorsi muscle wrap but without stimulation, and with synchronous left ventricular contraction-latissimus dorsi muscle stimulation. End-diastolic pressure was increased in both conditions after latissimus dorsi muscle wrap (without stimulation, 5 +/- 1; with stimulation, 6 +/- 2 mm Hg; p < 0.05) compared with baseline (3 +/- 2 mm Hg). The peak rate of diastolic pressure decay was greater at baseline (1560 +/- 370 mm Hg/sec) than after latissimus dorsi muscle wrap, both without (1260 +/- 330 mm Hg/sec, p < 0.01) and with (1120 +/- 420 mm Hg/sec, p < 0.01) stimulation. The constant of pressure decay was prolonged both without (53 +/- 10 seconds, p < 0.05) and with (62 +/- 11 seconds, p < 0.01) latissimus dorsi muscle stimulation compared with the baseline (38 +/- 5 seconds). Compared with baseline (0.2 +/- 0.2 cm-2), the constant of passive chamber stiffness increased after the latissimus dorsi muscle was wrapped around the heart (1.6 +/- 0.7 cm-2, p < 0.05) and with stimulation (2.1 +/- 1.0 cm-2, p < 0.01). The maximal diastolic filling rate (baseline, 18.1 +/- 6.7; without stimulation, 16.6 +/- 8.9; with stimulation, 16.6 +/- 4.1 cm2/sec, not significant) and end-diastolic short-axis area (baseline, 7.3 +/- 2.3; without stimulation, 7.4 +/- 2.1; with stimulation, 7.5 +/- 2.3 cm2, not significant) were similar among the three conditions. The latissimus dorsi muscle wrap prolonged relaxation and increased left ventricular passive stiffness. Synchronous latissimus dorsi muscle stimulation with left ventricular contraction did not improve diastolic function in this model. The results suggest that in the early postoperative period, dynamic cardiomyoplasty impairs diastolic function.
在充血性心力衰竭患者中,药物治疗的死亡率和发病率较高,而移植则受到供体心脏可用性的限制。动力性心肌成形术正在作为一种外科治疗方法进行研究,以改善这些患者的左心室功能。为了评估该手术对左心室舒张功能的早期术后影响,我们在动力性心肌成形术的犬模型中,通过使用超声微测技术和微测压技术研究了7只犬。在包裹背阔肌之前(基线)、包裹背阔肌但未刺激以及左心室收缩与背阔肌刺激同步时,测定左心室舒张参数。与基线(3±2mmHg)相比,包裹背阔肌后的两种情况下(未刺激时为5±1;刺激时为6±2mmHg;p<0.05),舒张末期压力均升高。舒张期压力衰减的峰值速率在基线时(1560±370mmHg/秒)高于包裹背阔肌后,无论是未刺激时(1260±330mmHg/秒,p<0.01)还是刺激时(1120±420mmHg/秒,p<0.01)。与基线(38±5秒)相比,在未刺激(53±10秒,p<0.05)和刺激(62±11秒,p<0.01)的情况下,压力衰减常数均延长。与基线(0.2±0.2cm-2)相比,当背阔肌包裹心脏后(1.6±0.7cm-2,p<0.05)以及刺激时(2.1±1.0cm-2,p<0.01),被动腔室僵硬度常数增加。三种情况下的最大舒张充盈率(基线时为18.1±6.7;未刺激时为16.6±8.9;刺激时为16.6±4.1cm2/秒,无显著差异)和舒张末期短轴面积(基线时为7.3±2.3;未刺激时为7.4±2.1;刺激时为7.5±2.3cm2,无显著差异)相似。背阔肌包裹延长了舒张期并增加了左心室的被动僵硬度。在该模型中,背阔肌与左心室收缩同步刺激并未改善舒张功能。结果表明,在术后早期,动力性心肌成形术会损害舒张功能。