Paul V, Balasubramaniam E, Sheela S, Krishnamoorthy M S
Department of Pharmacology and Environmental Toxicology, Dr. A. L. M. Postgraduate Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Madras, India.
Pharmacol Toxicol. 1992 Oct;71(4):254-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1992.tb00979.x.
The deteriorative effects after chronic endosulfan exposure on muscle coordination, learning and memory of rats were compared with that produced by aldrin which has been reported to have similar effects in experimental animals. A rota-rod apparatus was used to study the muscle coordination and learning and memory were tested by recording the response to unconditioned and conditioned stimuli using a pole-climbing apparatus. Aldrin but not endosulfan inhibited motor coordination in both sexes. A greater motor deterioration occurred in male group. This finding, together with the previous data which shows inhibition by its metabolite of motor activity, suggests that its metabolic product is responsible for this action. Like aldrin, endosulfan inhibited both learning ability and conditioned avoidance response. A change in the activities of brain monoamines or inhibition of perception and reflexes or both were proposed for these behavioural effects, since the former was reported to be produced by both compounds and the latter was found to occur in aldrin treated rats.
将慢性硫丹暴露后对大鼠肌肉协调性、学习和记忆的恶化影响与艾氏剂所产生的影响进行了比较,据报道艾氏剂在实验动物中具有类似影响。使用转棒仪研究肌肉协调性,并通过使用爬杆仪记录对非条件刺激和条件刺激的反应来测试学习和记忆。艾氏剂而非硫丹抑制了两性的运动协调性。雄性组出现了更严重的运动功能恶化。这一发现与之前显示其代谢产物抑制运动活动的数据一起表明,其代谢产物是造成这种作用的原因。与艾氏剂一样,硫丹抑制学习能力和条件性回避反应。针对这些行为影响,有人提出脑单胺活性的变化或对感知和反射的抑制或两者兼而有之,因为据报道前者由这两种化合物产生,而后者在经艾氏剂处理的大鼠中被发现。