Lyon Stuart M, Haslam Philip J, Duke Deirdre M, McGrath Frank P, Lee Michael J
Radiology Department, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Oct;14(10):1283-9. doi: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000092901.73329.eb.
To investigate the feasibility of primary button gastrostomy insertion with the aid of T-fastener gastropexy.
Fifty-three consecutive patients (33 men, 20 women; mean age, 63.4 years) referred for percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PRG) underwent primary button gastrostomy insertion over an 18-month period in two centers. Nine of the patients (17%) were referred after failed endoscopic gastrostomy and 44 (83%) were primarily referred for PRG. Indications for gastrostomy included esophageal/head and neck malignancy (n = 33) and neurologic disorders (n = 20). Gastropexy with three or four T-fasteners was performed in all patients and angioplasty balloon catheters (6 mm x 40 mm) were used to measure tract length and dilate the tract. An 18-F dilator was used for final tract dilation. Button gastrostomy catheters with retention balloons were inserted in all patients. Patient follow-up was performed by the department of dietetics, which contacted patients on a weekly basis.
Primary button gastrostomy insertion was successful in 52 of 53 patients (98%). The mean gastrostomy button catheter survival was 13.3 weeks (range, 1-28 weeks). No episodes of button occlusion occurred. Since the beginning of this study, 33 patients (63%) have had their gastrostomy buttons replaced. The reasons for button replacement include burst retention balloons (n = 27; 52%), dislodgment of the catheter (n = 4; 8%), and continuing pain/discomfort at the gastrostomy site (n = 2; 4%).
Button-type gastrostomy catheters can be placed de novo by interventional radiologists without the need for a mature tract, provided a T-fastener gastropexy is used. The balloon retention button devices are not compromised by occlusion but do tend to become dislodged.
探讨借助T形钉胃固定术进行初次纽扣式胃造口术置入的可行性。
在两个中心,连续53例患者(33例男性,20例女性;平均年龄63.4岁)因经皮放射学胃造口术(PRG)被转诊,在18个月的时间里接受了初次纽扣式胃造口术置入。其中9例患者(17%)在内镜下胃造口术失败后被转诊,44例患者(83%)最初因PRG被转诊。胃造口术的适应证包括食管/头颈部恶性肿瘤(n = 33)和神经系统疾病(n = 20)。所有患者均采用三枚或四枚T形钉进行胃固定术,并使用血管成形术球囊导管(6 mm×40 mm)测量通道长度并扩张通道。使用18F扩张器进行最终的通道扩张。所有患者均置入了带有保留球囊的纽扣式胃造口术导管。由营养科进行患者随访,营养科每周与患者联系。
53例患者中有52例(98%)初次纽扣式胃造口术置入成功。胃造口术纽扣导管的平均存活时间为13.3周(范围1 - 28周)。未发生纽扣堵塞事件。自本研究开始以来,33例患者(63%)更换了胃造口术纽扣。更换纽扣的原因包括保留球囊破裂(n = 27;52%)、导管移位(n = 4;8%)以及胃造口部位持续疼痛/不适(n = 2;4%)。
如果使用T形钉胃固定术,介入放射科医生可以在无需成熟通道的情况下重新放置纽扣式胃造口术导管。球囊保留纽扣装置不会因堵塞而受损,但确实容易移位。