Rashid Eanas, Ishtiaq Osama, Gilani Salman, Zafar Asif
Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad.
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2003 Apr-Jun;15(2):34-6.
To compare the accuracy of store and forward method of teledermatology with the traditional face-to-face consultation.
The comparison was done between Institute of Dermatology King Edward Medical College Lahore that served as teledermatology center and Dermatology Department of Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences Islamabad from where patients were selected. Telmedpak provided the technical support. Thirty three patients were selected from outpatient department of PIMS and images were taken using a digital camera. Images were stored in computer and were sent to Institute of Dermatology via e-mail for Teleconsultation along with a short history and examination findings. Diagnosis of consultant after face-to-face consultation was then compared with the image based diagnosis that is after teleconsultation.
In 81% of the cases the diagnosis on face-to-face consultation was same (p < 0.05) while in 18% of the cases the two diagnoses differed. In 9% (n = 3) of the cases, image resolution was not good but out of these three, diagnosis was same in two and differed in one case.
This study concludes that store and forward method of teledermatology is reliable and can provide a means of increasing access to dermatological care in rural and under-served areas.
比较远程皮肤病学的存储转发方法与传统面对面会诊的准确性。
以拉合尔爱德华国王医学院皮肤病研究所作为远程皮肤病学中心,与伊斯兰堡巴基斯坦医学科学研究所皮肤科进行比较,患者从后者选取。Telmedpak提供技术支持。从PIMS门诊部选取33例患者,用数码相机拍摄图像。图像存储在计算机中,并通过电子邮件发送至皮肤病研究所进行远程会诊,同时附上简短病史和检查结果。然后将面对面会诊后会诊医生的诊断与远程会诊后基于图像的诊断进行比较。
81%的病例中面对面会诊的诊断相同(p < 0.05),而18%的病例中两种诊断不同。9%(n = 3)的病例图像分辨率不佳,但在这三例中,两例诊断相同,一例不同。
本研究得出结论,远程皮肤病学的存储转发方法可靠,可为增加农村和服务不足地区获得皮肤科护理的机会提供一种手段。