Riska Elianne
Abo Akademi University, Finland.
Scand J Public Health. 2003;31(5):389-94. doi: 10.1080/14034940210165145.
This paper examines the similarities and differences in Scandinavian and American medical sociology. First, the issue of medicalization has not been as important in Scandinavian as it has been in American medical sociology. Second, women's health has been less explored in Scandinavian than in American medical sociology. Third, research on social inequalities and health has been a major focus in Scandinavian medical sociology since the 1990s. Fourth, cultural sociology and the poststructuralist perspective have been part of mainstream theory building in European sociology and also European and Scandinavian medical sociology during the past decade, while American medical sociology has been characterized by social-role theory and a quantitative approach.
本文探讨了斯堪的纳维亚和美国医学社会学的异同。首先,医疗化问题在斯堪的纳维亚没有在美国医学社会学中那么重要。其次,与美国医学社会学相比,斯堪的纳维亚对女性健康的研究较少。第三,自20世纪90年代以来,社会不平等与健康的研究一直是斯堪的纳维亚医学社会学的主要焦点。第四,在过去十年中,文化社会学和后结构主义视角一直是欧洲社会学以及欧洲和斯堪的纳维亚医学社会学主流理论构建的一部分,而美国医学社会学的特点是社会角色理论和定量研究方法。