El-Minawi M F, Abdel-Hadi M, Ibrahim A A, Wahby O
Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Jan;51(1):29-32.
A comparative study of hysterosalpingography (HSG) and laparoscopy in the investigation of infertility is presented. From 1973-1977, 352 cases were investigated with both HSG and laparoscopy. In 57.67% of the cases there was complete agreement between HSG and laparoscopy. The study included 168 cases of unexplained infertility and 184 cases with abnormal hysterosalpingographic findings. Pelvic adhesions were demonstrated in 151 cases by laparoscopy as compared to 76 cases in which its presence was only suspected by HSG. Laparoscopy revealed a 57.14% of associated pelvic pathology in cases of unexplained fertility. The present study concludes that laparoscopy as compared to HSG is not only more informative, but also more accurate and conclusive.
本文介绍了子宫输卵管造影术（HSG）和腹腔镜检查在不孕症调查中的对比研究。1973年至1977年期间，对352例患者同时进行了HSG和腹腔镜检查。在57.67%的病例中，HSG和腹腔镜检查结果完全一致。该研究包括168例不明原因不孕症患者和184例子宫输卵管造影结果异常的患者。腹腔镜检查发现151例有盆腔粘连，而HSG仅怀疑76例有盆腔粘连。腹腔镜检查显示，在不明原因不孕症病例中，57.14%伴有盆腔病理改变。本研究得出结论，与HSG相比，腹腔镜检查不仅提供的信息更多，而且更准确、更具决定性。
