Dabrowski Marek, Bielecki Dariusz, Gołebiewski Paweł, Kwieciński Hubert
Bielański Hospital and Research Unit for Cardiac Diagnosis and Therapy in Medical Research Center Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw, Poland.
Kardiol Pol. 2003 Jun;58(6):469-80.
Cerebro-vascular accidents are the third most common cause of death. The most frequent localisation of lesions responsible for stroke are bifurcation of the common carotid artery or the proximal internal carotid artery (ICA). Surgical carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) are the non-pharmacological methods used to treat carotid artery stenosis.
To assess the efficacy and safety of CAS of ICA.
CAS was performed in 75 patients (49 males, 26 females) with a mean age of 65.2+/-9.1 years. Twenty (26.7%) patients underwent CAS with the use of the central nervous system (CNS) protective devices. The immediate, mid-term, and long-term results were analysed.
In total, 84 stents were implanted to 80 ICA in 73 patients. In two patients stent implantation was not possible. In 7 (9%) patients with a stenosis of both ICA, a bilateral procedure was performed. In two patients concomitant dilatations of the vertebral artery, and in the other two - of subclavian artery, were performed. In 38 patients coronary angiography was performed directly before CAS; one patient underwent coronary angioplasty. In 20 patients protective CNS devices were used. During the procedure four patients developed ischaemic stroke on the side of CAS. In one patient neurological symptoms completely disappeared within 48 hours. The type of technique used during CAS did not influence the frequency of ischaemic complications. Four patients developed hyperperfusion syndrome which disappeared after a few days. There were fire deaths during follow-up: three due to myocardial infarction (MI), one - after urgent CABG, and one due to pulmonary embolism. There were no deaths due to stroke. No new ischaemic changes in CNS nor significant changes in the neurological status, using the UNSS or Barthel scales, were observed. Asymptomatic restenosis was documented in six patients whereas one patient developed symptomatic restenosis due to stent deformation.
Percutaneous angioplasty of an internal carotid artery carries a risk not exceeding that of surgical endarterectomy. In our study, a one-year follow-up revealed a minor risk of ischaemic stroke. Percutaneous angioplasty with the use of protective devices should be tested in larger groups of patients in order to establish the real clinical usefulness and improved safety of this technique.
脑血管意外是第三大常见死因。导致中风的病变最常见的部位是颈总动脉分叉处或颈内动脉(ICA)近端。外科颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)是用于治疗颈动脉狭窄的非药物方法。
评估ICA的CAS的疗效和安全性。
对75例患者(49例男性,26例女性)进行CAS,平均年龄65.2±9.1岁。20例(26.7%)患者在使用中枢神经系统(CNS)保护装置的情况下接受CAS。分析了即刻、中期和长期结果。
共对73例患者的80条ICA植入了84枚支架。2例患者无法进行支架植入。7例(9%)双侧ICA狭窄患者接受了双侧手术。2例患者同时进行了椎动脉扩张,另外2例进行了锁骨下动脉扩张。38例患者在CAS前直接进行了冠状动脉造影;1例患者接受了冠状动脉成形术。20例患者使用了CNS保护装置。术中4例患者在CAS侧发生缺血性中风。1例患者的神经症状在48小时内完全消失。CAS期间使用的技术类型不影响缺血性并发症的发生率。4例患者出现高灌注综合征,几天后消失。随访期间有5例死亡:3例死于心肌梗死(MI),1例在紧急冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后死亡,1例死于肺栓塞。没有因中风死亡的病例。使用UNSS或Barthel量表未观察到CNS有新的缺血性变化,神经状态也无显著变化。6例患者记录有无症状性再狭窄,1例患者因支架变形出现症状性再狭窄。
经皮颈内动脉血管成形术的风险不超过外科内膜切除术。在我们的研究中,一年的随访显示缺血性中风风险较小。应在更大规模的患者群体中测试使用保护装置的经皮血管成形术,以确定该技术的实际临床效用和提高安全性。