• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉支架置入术的安全性和有效性。

Safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting.

作者信息

Wang Yi-qing, Saiwah David Ho, Wang Yan, Zheng Jian-tao, Jiang Hong-fei, Chen Bing-huang

机构信息

Heart Center, Zhongshan Hospital affiliated to Xiamen University, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen 361004, China.

出版信息

Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2006 Jan;26(1):6-10.

PMID:16495166
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS).

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of 76 carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedures in a consecutive series of 70 Chinese patients. This series represented a high-risk group that included patients with unstable angina, previous ipsilateral CEA, contralateral carotid artery occlusion, post-radiation carotid artery stenosis and other severe co-morbid conditions. The patients had independent neurological examinations before and after the procedure and follow-up cerebral angiography at 6 month.

RESULTS

The procedural success rate was 100%. The mean carotid artery stenosis was (82+/-18) % before and (5+/-10) % after the procedure. During the initial hospital period and 30 days after CAS, there was no major stroke but 3 minor strokes (5.7%). No myocardial infarctions or deaths occurred during or within 30 days following CAS. At a mean follow-up of 20+/-12 months, 2 patients (2.8%) had asymptomatic restenosis, and 2 non-Q wave myocardial infarction. Death occurred in 2 cases, but none of them was attributed to a neurological cause. Three patients had minor strokes and no major strokes occurred during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous carotid artery stenting is feasible for performance in Chinese patients and may lower the restenosis rate.

摘要

目的

评估颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们前瞻性地评估了连续70例中国患者中76例颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的安全性和有效性。该系列代表了一个高危组,包括不稳定型心绞痛患者、既往同侧颈动脉内膜切除术患者、对侧颈动脉闭塞患者、放疗后颈动脉狭窄患者以及其他严重合并症患者。患者在手术前后进行了独立的神经学检查,并在6个月时进行了随访脑血管造影。

结果

手术成功率为100%。术前平均颈动脉狭窄为(82±18)%,术后为(5±10)%。在最初住院期间和CAS术后30天内,未发生重大卒中,但有3例轻微卒中(5.7%)。CAS期间及术后30天内未发生心肌梗死或死亡。平均随访20±12个月时,2例患者(2.8%)出现无症状再狭窄,2例发生非Q波心肌梗死。2例患者死亡,但均非神经原因所致。3例患者发生轻微卒中,随访期间未发生重大卒中。

结论

经皮颈动脉支架置入术在中国患者中可行,且可能降低再狭窄率。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术的安全性和有效性。
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2006 Jan;26(1):6-10.
2
Outcomes of carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis: a single neurovascular center retrospective review of 101 consecutive patients.颈动脉狭窄高危患者颈动脉支架置入术的结果:单神经血管中心 101 例连续患者的回顾性研究。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Mar;66(3):448-53; discussion 453-4. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000365008.17803.AD.
3
Outcomes following extracranial carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.高危患者颅外颈动脉支架置入术后的结局
J Invasive Cardiol. 2001 May;13(5):375-81.
4
Percutaneous internal carotid artery angioplasty with stenting: early and long-term results.经皮颈内动脉血管成形术及支架置入术:早期和长期结果
Kardiol Pol. 2003 Jun;58(6):469-80.
5
Safety of latest-generation self-expanding stents in patients with NASCET-ineligible severe symptomatic extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.新一代自膨式支架在不符合北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术(NASCET)标准的重度症状性颅外颈内动脉狭窄患者中的安全性
Arch Neurol. 2004 Jan;61(1):39-43. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.1.39.
6
Internal carotid artery stenting in patients over 80 years of age: single-center experience and review of the literature.80岁以上患者的颈内动脉支架置入术:单中心经验及文献综述
J Neuroimaging. 2009 Apr;19(2):158-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2008.00269.x. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
7
Carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients: midterm mortality analysis.高危患者的颈动脉支架置入术:中期死亡率分析
Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 Mar;22(2):185-9. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.08.001. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
8
Outcome of carotid artery stenting for primary versus restenotic lesions.原发性病变与再狭窄病变的颈动脉支架置入术结果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 May-Jun;23(3):330-4. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
9
The CAPTURE registry: predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting with embolic protection for high surgical risk patients in the early post-approval setting.CAPTURE注册研究:早期批准后使用栓子保护装置对高手术风险患者进行颈动脉支架置入术的预后预测因素。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Dec 1;70(7):1025-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21359.
10
Comparison of in-hospital outcomes of patients with versus without previous carotid endarterectomy undergoing carotid stenting (from the German ALKK CAS Registry).接受颈动脉支架置入术的既往有或无颈动脉内膜切除术患者的院内结局比较(来自德国ALKK CAS注册研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2007 May 1;99(9):1288-93. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.12.047. Epub 2007 Mar 15.