Ossip-Klein Deborah J, McIntosh Scott
James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
Am J Med Sci. 2003 Oct;326(4):201-5. doi: 10.1097/00000441-200310000-00010.
Quitlines provide a model for the translation of research findings to public health application. Quitlines are currently in operation in more than half of US states, in Canada, and in multiple countries globally. Overall, when implemented correctly, quitlines have been shown to be efficacious and effective. Multiple quitline models are in use, but there is no evidence on the relative effectiveness of one over the other. Differences have been demonstrated for the efficacy of quitlines for specific applications, with the strongest evidence base for application as a primary intervention or as follow-up for hospitalized patients and particularly for cardiac patients. The evidence base for both reactive and proactive services is reviewed, and future directions to continue to advance the field are discussed.
戒烟热线为将研究成果转化为公共卫生应用提供了一个范例。目前,美国半数以上的州、加拿大以及全球多个国家都设有戒烟热线。总体而言,若实施得当,戒烟热线已被证明是有效且高效的。目前使用着多种戒烟热线模式,但尚无证据表明哪种模式相对更有效。已证实戒烟热线在特定应用中的功效存在差异,其中作为主要干预措施或针对住院患者尤其是心脏病患者的后续跟进措施的应用,证据最为充分。本文对反应性服务和主动性服务的证据基础进行了综述,并讨论了该领域未来继续发展的方向。