Suppr超能文献

退出戒烟热线:一项关于患者对戒烟热线电子转介体验的定性研究。

Quitting the quitline: a qualitative study of patient experience of electronic referrals to quitlines.

机构信息

Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7136, USA.

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):1080. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09185-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of electronic referrals (eReferrals) to state quitlines (QLs) for tobacco-using patients is a promising approach for addressing smoking cessation on a large scale. However, QL contact, enrollment, and completion rates are low. The purpose of this study was to examine the eReferral to QL process from the patient's perspective in order to inform strategies for improving QL engagement.

METHODS

We conducted interviews with 55 patients who agreed to an eReferral at a primary care visit to 1 of 8 safety-net community health centers in Cuyahoga County, Ohio (September 2017-August 2018). Interviews were designed to explore the experiences of three subgroups of patients who subsequently: 1) declined participation in the QL; 2) were unreachable by the QL; or 3) were enrolled in or had completed the QL program. Analysis was guided by a phenomenological approach designed to identify emergent themes.

RESULTS

Reasons for QL program non-completion included changing life circumstances and events making cessation unviable; misunderstandings about the QL; discomfort with telephonic counseling; perceived lack of time for counseling; cell phone barriers; and having already quit smoking. We found that some individuals who were no longer engaged with the QL still desired continued support from the QL.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants intentionally and unintentionally disengage from the QL for a wide variety of reasons, several of which are mediated by low socioeconomic status. Integrating QL care with community-based resources that address these mediators could be a promising strategy.

摘要

背景

电子转诊(eReferrals)到州戒烟热线(QLs)为使用烟草的患者提供了一种大规模解决戒烟问题的有前途的方法。然而,QL 的联系、参与和完成率都很低。本研究的目的是从患者的角度检查电子转诊到 QL 的过程,以便为改善 QL 参与度提供策略。

方法

我们对 55 名患者进行了访谈,这些患者在俄亥俄州凯霍加县的 8 家社区卫生中心中的 1 家就诊时同意进行电子转诊(2017 年 9 月至 2018 年 8 月)。访谈旨在探讨随后经历以下三种亚组患者的经历:1)拒绝参与 QL;2)无法与 QL 联系;或 3)已注册或已完成 QL 计划。分析的指导原则是一种旨在识别新兴主题的现象学方法。

结果

QL 项目未完成的原因包括生活环境和事件的变化使戒烟变得不可行;对 QL 的误解;对电话咨询的不适;认为没有时间接受咨询;手机障碍;以及已经戒烟。我们发现,一些不再参与 QL 的人仍然希望从 QL 获得持续的支持。

结论

参与者有意或无意地出于各种原因不再参与 QL,其中一些原因是由低社会经济地位介导的。将 QL 护理与解决这些中介因素的基于社区的资源相结合可能是一种有前途的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ee/7350715/9a6cff8cc84a/12889_2020_9185_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验