Coubard Olivier, Daunys Gintautas, Kapoula Zoï
Laboratoire de Physiologie de la Perception et de l'Action, UMR 7124 CNRS-Collège de France, 11, place Marcelin Berthelot, 75005 Paris, France.
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Feb;154(3):368-81. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1670-7. Epub 2003 Oct 14.
To explore visual space, we make saccades, vergence, and, most frequently, combined saccade-vergence eye movements. The initiation of saccades is well studied, while that of vergence is less explored. Saccade latency is influenced by the fixation task: when the target appears simultaneously with the offset of the fixation point, latencies tend to be regular, whereas the introduction of a gap period before target onset causes the emergence of express latencies (80- to 120-ms). This study examines in ten normal adults whether the gap paradigm has a similar effect on the latency of vergence and combined eye movements. The second goal is to identify contextual factors that favor the emergence of short latencies, by comparing a condition in which gap and simultaneous trials were performed in separate blocks (pure blocks) with a condition in which the two types of trials were interleaved randomly (mixed blocks). The results are: (1) the gap paradigm reduced similarly (by approximately -30 ms) the mean latency of saccades, convergence, divergence, and both the saccadic and vergence components of combined eye movements; (2) the gap paradigm was responsible for the emergence of 80- to 120-ms latencies for saccades and divergence (pure or combined), but rarely for convergence; (3) inspection of the latency distributions showed that such short latencies formed a clearly distinct population, different from anticipatory responses or regular latencies, for saccades (pure or combined) but not for pure vergence; importantly, distinct express latencies were found also for the convergence and divergence components of combined eye movements; (4) no difference was found for the group of subjects between pure and mixed blocks, but the latter yielded shorter latencies for some subjects, suggesting an idiosyncratic phenomenon. We suggest that distinct express latencies are specific to saccades and could correspond to a specific mode of saccade initiation. Interestingly, the express mode of triggering can be transferred to the vergence component in the ecological condition in which saccade is combined with vergence.
为了探索视觉空间,我们会进行扫视、辐辏,以及最常见的扫视-辐辏联合眼球运动。扫视的启动机制已得到充分研究,而辐辏的启动机制则较少被探究。扫视潜伏期受注视任务的影响:当目标与注视点的偏移同时出现时,潜伏期往往较为规律,而在目标出现前引入间隙期则会导致快速潜伏期(80至120毫秒)的出现。本研究在十名正常成年人中检验间隙范式对辐辏和联合眼球运动潜伏期是否有类似影响。第二个目标是通过比较在单独的组块中进行间隙和同步试验的条件(纯组块)与两种试验随机交错进行的条件(混合组块),来确定有利于出现短潜伏期的情境因素。结果如下:(1)间隙范式同样降低了(约 -30毫秒)扫视、会聚、发散以及联合眼球运动的扫视和辐辏成分的平均潜伏期;(2)间隙范式导致了扫视和发散(纯或联合)出现80至120毫秒的潜伏期,但很少导致会聚出现这种情况;(3)对潜伏期分布的检查表明,这种短潜伏期形成了一个明显不同的群体,对于扫视(纯或联合)而言,与预期反应或常规潜伏期不同,但对于纯辐辏则不然;重要的是,联合眼球运动的会聚和发散成分也发现了明显的快速潜伏期;(4)在受试者组中,纯组块和混合组块之间未发现差异,但混合组块对一些受试者产生了较短的潜伏期,表明这是一种个体差异现象。我们认为,明显的快速潜伏期是扫视所特有的,可能对应于扫视启动的一种特定模式。有趣的是,在扫视与辐辏相结合的生态条件下,触发的快速模式可以转移到辐辏成分上。