Maduell F, Gutiérrez E, Navarro V, Torregrosa E, Martínez A, Rius A
Servicio de Nefrología Hospital General de Castellón Avda. Benicassim, s/n, 12004 Castellón.
Nefrologia. 2003 Jul-Aug;23(4):344-9.
Daily dialysis has shown excellent clinical results because a higher frequency of dialysis is more physiological. Different methods have been described to calculate dialysis dose which take into consideration change in frequency. The aim of this study was to calculate all dialysis dose possibilities and evaluate the better and practical options. Eight patients, 6 males and 2 females, on standard 4 to 5 hours thrice weekly on-line hemodiafiltration (S-OL-HDF) were switched to daily on-line hemodiafiltration (D-OL-HDF) 2 to 2.5 hours six times per week. Dialysis parameters were identical during both periods and only frequency and dialysis time of each session were changed. Time average concentration (TAC), time average deviation (TAD), normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR), Kt/V, equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V), equivalent renal urea clearance (EKR), standard Kt/V (stdKt/V), urea reduction ratio (URR), hemodialysis product and time off dialysis were measured. Daily on-line hemodiafiltration was well accepted and tolerated. Patients maintained the same TAC although TAD decreased from 9.7 +/- 2 in baseline to a 6.2 +/- 2 mg/dl after six months, p < 0.01. No significant changes were observed in weekly Kt/V and eKt/V throughout the study. However EKR, stdKt/V and weekly URR were increased during D-OL-HDF in 24-34%, 46% and 50%, respectively. Hemodialysis product was raised in a 95% and time off dialysis was reduced to half.
Dialysis frequency is an important urea kinetic parameter which there are to take in consideration. It's necessary to use EKR, stdKt/V or weekly URR to calculate dialysis dose for an adequate comparison between different frequency dialysis schedules.
每日透析已显示出优异的临床效果,因为更高的透析频率更符合生理状态。已经描述了不同的方法来计算透析剂量,这些方法考虑了频率的变化。本研究的目的是计算所有透析剂量的可能性,并评估更好且实用的选择。8名患者,6名男性和2名女性,从标准的每周三次、每次4至5小时的在线血液透析滤过(S - OL - HDF)转换为每周六次、每次2至2.5小时的每日在线血液透析滤过(D - OL - HDF)。两个阶段的透析参数相同,仅每次透析的频率和时间发生了变化。测量了时间平均浓度(TAC)、时间平均偏差(TAD)、标准化蛋白分解代谢率(nPCR)、Kt/V、平衡Kt/V(eKt/V)、等效肾尿素清除率(EKR)、标准Kt/V(stdKt/V)、尿素清除率(URR)、血液透析产物和透析间隔时间。每日在线血液透析滤过被很好地接受和耐受。患者维持相同的TAC,尽管TAD从基线时的9.7±2降至六个月后的6.2±2mg/dl,p < 0.01。在整个研究过程中,每周的Kt/V和eKt/V未观察到显著变化。然而,在D - OL - HDF期间,EKR、stdKt/V和每周URR分别增加了24 - 34%、46%和50%。血液透析产物提高了95%,透析间隔时间减少至一半。
透析频率是一个重要的尿素动力学参数,需要予以考虑。有必要使用EKR、stdKt/V或每周URR来计算透析剂量,以便在不同频率的透析方案之间进行充分比较。