Jensen A L, Poulsen J S
Department of Clinical Studies, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Zentralbl Veterinarmed A. 1992 Nov;39(9):656-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.1992.tb00231.x.
The value of a diagnostic test depends on most cases on its ability to discriminate between patients with and without a certain disease. One way of evaluating a diagnostic test is to use the relative operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) and the differential positive rate (DPR). The ROC curve displays the relationship between the true positive ratio and the false positive ratio for a range of cutoff values and it can be used to compare various diagnostic tests under equivalent conditions (equal true positive ratios or false positive ratios) and over the entire range of cutoff values. The DPR is the difference between the true positive ratio and the false positive ratio at various cutoff values and it can be used to obtain the cutoff value associated with the highest sensitivity and specificity. The purpose of this study was to describe the evaluation and comparison of diagnostic tests using ROC curves and DPR. Eventually, the positive and negative predictive values were used to assess the differences between the sensitivity and specificity obtained when the upper limit of the reference interval, or the optimal cutoff value indicated by the DPR, was used as cutoff value. To illustrate the methods, the 2 h post-prandial total serum bile acid concentration (PSBA) and the alanine aminotransferase activity (ALAT) in the diagnosis of primary or secondary hepatobiliary diseases in dogs were used. The ROC curves showed, as expected from previous studies, that PSBA was superior to ALAT in diagnosing dogs with hepatobiliary diseases. Using DPR, the optimal cutoff value for PSBA was suggested to be 15.48 mumol/l. Compared to the traditionally used cutoff value of 22.24 mumol/l, no decisive difference in the positive predictive values were observed. However, the cutoff value of 15.48 mumol/l appeared to produce higher negative predictive values compared to a cutoff value of 22.24 mumol/l. Seemingly, ROC curves and DPR are simple methods useful to the evaluation of diagnostic tests and due to the simplicity, there seems to be a great potential for these methods in the evaluation of diagnostic tests in veterinary medicine.
在大多数情况下,诊断测试的价值取决于其区分患有和未患有某种疾病的患者的能力。评估诊断测试的一种方法是使用相对操作特征曲线(ROC曲线)和差异阳性率(DPR)。ROC曲线显示了一系列临界值下真阳性率和假阳性率之间的关系,可用于在等效条件下(相等的真阳性率或假阳性率)以及整个临界值范围内比较各种诊断测试。DPR是不同临界值下真阳性率与假阳性率之间的差值,可用于获得与最高灵敏度和特异性相关的临界值。本研究的目的是描述使用ROC曲线和DPR对诊断测试进行评估和比较。最终,使用阳性和阴性预测值来评估当参考区间上限或DPR指示的最佳临界值用作临界值时所获得的灵敏度和特异性之间的差异。为了说明这些方法,使用了犬餐后2小时血清总胆汁酸浓度(PSBA)和丙氨酸转氨酶活性(ALAT)来诊断原发性或继发性肝胆疾病。正如先前研究所预期的那样,ROC曲线显示PSBA在诊断患有肝胆疾病的犬方面优于ALAT。使用DPR,建议PSBA的最佳临界值为15.48μmol/L。与传统使用的22.24μmol/L临界值相比,未观察到阳性预测值有决定性差异。然而,与22.24μmol/L的临界值相比,15.48μmol/L的临界值似乎产生了更高的阴性预测值。似乎,ROC曲线和DPR是用于评估诊断测试的简单方法,并且由于其简单性,这些方法在兽医学诊断测试评估中似乎具有很大的潜力。