Suppr超能文献

口服神经激肽-1拮抗剂阿瑞匹坦预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐:一项针对接受高剂量顺铂治疗患者的多国、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验——阿瑞匹坦方案052研究组

The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin--the Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study Group.

作者信息

Hesketh Paul J, Grunberg Steven M, Gralla Richard J, Warr David G, Roila Fausto, de Wit Ronald, Chawla Sant P, Carides Alexandra D, Ianus Juliana, Elmer Mary E, Evans Judith K, Beck Klaus, Reines Scott, Horgan Kevin J

机构信息

Caritas St Elizabeth's Medical Center, Brighton, MA 02135-2997, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2003 Nov 15;21(22):4112-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.095. Epub 2003 Oct 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In early clinical trials with patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy, the neurokinin antagonist aprepitant significantly enhanced the efficacy of a standard antiemetic regimen consisting of a type-three 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist and a corticosteroid. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study was performed to establish definitively the superiority of the aprepitant regimen versus standard therapy in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients receiving cisplatin > or = 70 mg/m2 for the first time were given either standard therapy (ondansetron and dexamethasone on day 1; dexamethasone on days 2 to 4) or an aprepitant regimen (aprepitant plus ondansetron and dexamethasone on day 1; aprepitant and dexamethasone on days 2 to 3; dexamethasone on day 4). Patients recorded nausea and vomiting episodes in a diary. The primary end point was complete response (no emesis and no rescue therapy) on days 1 to 5 postcisplatin, analyzed by a modified intent-to-treat approach. Treatment comparisons were made using logistic regression models. Tolerability was assessed by reported adverse events and physical and laboratory assessments.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients with complete response on days 1 to 5 was significantly higher in the aprepitant group (72.7% [n = 260] v 52.3% in the standard therapy group [n = 260]), as were the percentages on day 1, and especially on days 2 to 5 (P <.001 for all three comparisons).

CONCLUSION

Compared with standard dual therapy, addition of aprepitant was generally well tolerated and provided consistently superior protection against CINV in patients receiving highly emetogenic cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

摘要

目的

在接受高致吐性化疗患者的早期临床试验中,神经激肽拮抗剂阿瑞匹坦显著增强了由一种Ⅲ型5-羟色胺拮抗剂和一种皮质类固醇组成的标准止吐方案的疗效。进行这项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的Ⅲ期研究,以明确确定阿瑞匹坦方案在预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)方面相对于标准治疗的优越性。

患者与方法

首次接受顺铂剂量≥70mg/m²的患者,要么接受标准治疗(第1天使用昂丹司琼和地塞米松;第2至4天使用地塞米松),要么接受阿瑞匹坦方案(第1天使用阿瑞匹坦加昂丹司琼和地塞米松;第2至3天使用阿瑞匹坦和地塞米松;第4天使用地塞米松)。患者在日记中记录恶心和呕吐发作情况。主要终点是顺铂治疗后第1至5天的完全缓解(无呕吐且无救援治疗),采用改良意向性治疗方法进行分析。使用逻辑回归模型进行治疗比较。通过报告的不良事件以及体格和实验室评估来评估耐受性。

结果

阿瑞匹坦组第1至5天完全缓解的患者百分比显著更高(分别为72.7%[n = 260]和标准治疗组的52.3%[n = 260]),第1天,尤其是第2至5天的百分比也是如此(所有三项比较P <.001)。

结论

与标准双联疗法相比,添加阿瑞匹坦通常耐受性良好,并为接受基于顺铂的高致吐性化疗的患者提供了始终如一的更优CINV防护。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验