Kemper Alex R, Clark Sarah J, Freed Gary L
Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, Division of General Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0456, USA.
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2003 Sep-Oct;40(5):279-82. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-20030901-08.
Little is known about the pattern and variation of care offered to preschool-aged children who have had an abnormal vision screening test.
To evaluate the variations in pediatric eye care services and availability of optometrists and ophthalmologists for preschool-aged patients, referral patterns, and barriers to providing care as perceived by eye care specialists.
A survey was mailed to 542 ophthalmologists and a random sample of 501 optometrists actively practicing in Michigan.
The response rate was 65% (optometrists, 75%; ophthalmologists, 57%). More optometrists than ophthalmologists evaluated preschool-aged children (97% vs 79%; P < .001). Of these, most managed amblyopia (80% vs 77%; P = .372) and strabismus (89% vs 80%; P = .002) themselves. Fewer optometrists than ophthalmologists dilated eyes routinely during the first evaluation of a preschool-aged child (39% vs 93%; P < .001). The leading barrier to care for preschool-aged children reported by both optometrists and ophthalmologists was difficulty of the examination (25% vs 23%; P = .501). Optometrists reported that most of their patients were referred from community-based screening programs or by parent self-referral. Ophthalmologists reported that most of their preschool-aged patients were referred from primary care providers.
There are different sources of referrals for optometrists and ophthalmologists. Although most eye care specialists treat amblyopia, the types of care offered by optometrists and ophthalmologists differ. Future studies should address the impact that these patterns have on outcomes and cost. The results of these studies should be shared with those responsible for screening.
对于视力筛查测试结果异常的学龄前儿童所接受的护理模式及差异,人们了解甚少。
评估儿科眼科护理服务的差异、学龄前患者验光师和眼科医生的可及性、转诊模式以及眼科护理专家所感知到的提供护理的障碍。
向在密歇根州积极执业的542名眼科医生和501名验光师的随机样本邮寄了一份调查问卷。
回复率为65%(验光师为75%;眼科医生为57%)。评估学龄前儿童的验光师比眼科医生更多(97%对79%;P <.001)。其中,大多数人自行处理弱视(80%对77%;P =.372)和斜视(89%对80%;P =.002)。在对学龄前儿童的首次评估中,常规散瞳的验光师比眼科医生少(39%对93%;P <.001)。验光师和眼科医生报告的学龄前儿童护理的主要障碍都是检查困难(25%对23%;P =.501)。验光师报告说,他们的大多数患者是由社区筛查项目转诊或家长自行转诊而来。眼科医生报告说,他们的大多数学龄前患者是由初级保健提供者转诊而来。
验光师和眼科医生的转诊来源不同。尽管大多数眼科护理专家都治疗弱视,但验光师和眼科医生提供的护理类型有所不同。未来的研究应探讨这些模式对治疗结果和成本的影响。这些研究的结果应与负责筛查的人员分享。