• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Services provided for preschool-aged children with suspected amblyopia.为疑似弱视的学龄前儿童提供的服务。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2003 Sep-Oct;40(5):279-82. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-20030901-08.
2
A survey of Alabama eye care providers in 2010-2011.2010-2011 年阿拉巴马州眼科保健提供者调查。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr 3;14:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-44.
3
Australian optometric and ophthalmologic referral pathways for people with age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma.澳大利亚针对年龄相关性黄斑变性、糖尿病视网膜病变和青光眼患者的验光及眼科转诊途径。
Clin Exp Optom. 2014 May;97(3):248-55. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12119. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
4
Postoperative management of cataract surgery patients by ophthalmologists and optometrists.眼科医生和验光师对白内障手术患者的术后管理。
Arch Ophthalmol. 1996 Sep;114(9):1121-7. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1996.01100140323012.
5
The Effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of Community versus Hospital Eye Service follow-up for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration with quiescent disease (ECHoES): a virtual randomised balanced incomplete block trial.社区与医院眼科服务对静止期新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者进行随访的有效性、成本效益及可接受性研究(ECHoES):一项虚拟随机平衡不完全区组试验
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Oct;20(80):1-120. doi: 10.3310/hta20800.
6
A survey of clinical prescribing philosophies for hyperopia.一项关于远视临床处方理念的调查。
Optom Vis Sci. 2004 Apr;81(4):233-7. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200404000-00008.
7
The assessment and management of strabismus and amblyopia: a national audit.斜视与弱视的评估和管理:一项全国性审计。
Eye (Lond). 2002 Sep;16(5):522-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700136.
8
Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study.在学龄前儿童视力研究中,由持牌眼保健专业人员进行的学龄前视力筛查测试的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2004 Apr;111(4):637-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.01.022.
9
Access to Pediatric Eye Care Following Vision Screening.儿童眼病保健服务可及性:基于视力筛查结果。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2022 Nov-Dec;59(6):369-374. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20220210-04. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
10
Diabetic retinopathy: effects of national guidelines on the referral, examination and treatment practices of ophthalmologists and optometrists.糖尿病视网膜病变:国家指南对眼科医生和验光师转诊、检查及治疗实践的影响
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001 Apr;29(2):52-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2001.d01-3.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Preschool Vision Screening Collaborative: Successful Uptake of Guidelines in Primary Care.学前视力筛查协作组:基层医疗中指南的成功采用
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2019 Nov 28;4(6):e241. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000241. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.
2
Evaluation of 'vision screening' program for three to six-year-old children in the Republic of Iran.伊朗共和国 3 至 6 岁儿童“视力筛查”计划评估。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov-Dec;57(6):437-42. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.57151.
3
Patterns of vision care among Medicaid-enrolled children.医疗补助计划参保儿童的视力保健模式。
Pediatrics. 2004 Mar;113(3 Pt 1):e190-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.3.e190.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized trial of atropine vs. patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children.阿托品与眼罩治疗儿童中度弱视的随机试验。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Mar;120(3):268-78. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.3.268.
2
Preschool vision screening: summary of a Task Force report. Behalf of the Maternal and Child Health Bureau and the National Eye Institute Task Force on Vision Screening in the Preschool Child.学龄前视力筛查:特别工作组报告摘要。代表母婴健康局和国家眼科研究所学龄前儿童视力筛查特别工作组。
Pediatrics. 2000 Nov;106(5):1105-16. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.5.1105.
3
Vision therapy: information for health care and other allied professionals. American Academy of Optometry and the American Optometric Association.
Optom Vis Sci. 1999 Nov;76(11):739-40.
4
Health care changes from a public health perspective: implications for optometry-ophthalmology relations.
Optom Vis Sci. 1997 Dec;74(12):1019-24. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199712000-00023.
5
Access, provision, and cost of routine eye care: a comparison of Oregon optometrists and ophthalmologists.
J Am Optom Assoc. 1994 Apr;65(4):240-7.
6
Comparison of examination fees and availability of routine vision care by optometrists and ophthalmologists.验光师和眼科医生的检查费用及常规视力保健服务可及性比较。
Public Health Rep. 1991 Jul-Aug;106(4):455-9.
7
Efficacy and stability of amblyopia therapy.弱视治疗的疗效与稳定性
Optom Vis Sci. 1992 Oct;69(10):747-54. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199210000-00001.

为疑似弱视的学龄前儿童提供的服务。

Services provided for preschool-aged children with suspected amblyopia.

作者信息

Kemper Alex R, Clark Sarah J, Freed Gary L

机构信息

Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, Division of General Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0456, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2003 Sep-Oct;40(5):279-82. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-20030901-08.

DOI:10.3928/0191-3913-20030901-08
PMID:14560835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2561173/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the pattern and variation of care offered to preschool-aged children who have had an abnormal vision screening test.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the variations in pediatric eye care services and availability of optometrists and ophthalmologists for preschool-aged patients, referral patterns, and barriers to providing care as perceived by eye care specialists.

METHODS

A survey was mailed to 542 ophthalmologists and a random sample of 501 optometrists actively practicing in Michigan.

RESULTS

The response rate was 65% (optometrists, 75%; ophthalmologists, 57%). More optometrists than ophthalmologists evaluated preschool-aged children (97% vs 79%; P < .001). Of these, most managed amblyopia (80% vs 77%; P = .372) and strabismus (89% vs 80%; P = .002) themselves. Fewer optometrists than ophthalmologists dilated eyes routinely during the first evaluation of a preschool-aged child (39% vs 93%; P < .001). The leading barrier to care for preschool-aged children reported by both optometrists and ophthalmologists was difficulty of the examination (25% vs 23%; P = .501). Optometrists reported that most of their patients were referred from community-based screening programs or by parent self-referral. Ophthalmologists reported that most of their preschool-aged patients were referred from primary care providers.

CONCLUSIONS

There are different sources of referrals for optometrists and ophthalmologists. Although most eye care specialists treat amblyopia, the types of care offered by optometrists and ophthalmologists differ. Future studies should address the impact that these patterns have on outcomes and cost. The results of these studies should be shared with those responsible for screening.

摘要

背景

对于视力筛查测试结果异常的学龄前儿童所接受的护理模式及差异,人们了解甚少。

目的

评估儿科眼科护理服务的差异、学龄前患者验光师和眼科医生的可及性、转诊模式以及眼科护理专家所感知到的提供护理的障碍。

方法

向在密歇根州积极执业的542名眼科医生和501名验光师的随机样本邮寄了一份调查问卷。

结果

回复率为65%(验光师为75%;眼科医生为57%)。评估学龄前儿童的验光师比眼科医生更多(97%对79%;P <.001)。其中,大多数人自行处理弱视(80%对77%;P =.372)和斜视(89%对80%;P =.002)。在对学龄前儿童的首次评估中,常规散瞳的验光师比眼科医生少(39%对93%;P <.001)。验光师和眼科医生报告的学龄前儿童护理的主要障碍都是检查困难(25%对23%;P =.501)。验光师报告说,他们的大多数患者是由社区筛查项目转诊或家长自行转诊而来。眼科医生报告说,他们的大多数学龄前患者是由初级保健提供者转诊而来。

结论

验光师和眼科医生的转诊来源不同。尽管大多数眼科护理专家都治疗弱视,但验光师和眼科医生提供的护理类型有所不同。未来的研究应探讨这些模式对治疗结果和成本的影响。这些研究的结果应与负责筛查的人员分享。