Ardizzone S, Bollani S, Manzionna G, Imbesi V, Colombo E, Bianchi Porro G
L. Sacco University Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157 Milan, Italy.
Dig Liver Dis. 2003 Sep;35(9):619-27. doi: 10.1016/s1590-8658(03)00372-4.
The efficacy of azathioprine in the treatment of chronic active Crohn's disease is well established. However, this drug has a long onset of action. Methotrexate has also been shown to be effective in chronic active Crohn's disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of methotrexate in comparison with azathioprine, and to establish whether methotrexate has a shorter onset of action in this setting.
Patients with chronic active Crohn's disease were admitted to this investigator-blind study. Chronicity was defined as the need for steroid therapy of > or = 10 mg/day for at least 4 months during the preceding 12 months, with at least one attempt to discontinue treatment. The disease had to be clinically active at entry, with a Crohn's Disease Activity Index of > or = 200. Six patients treated with azathioprine and methotrexate, respectively, were found to have enterocutaneous and perianal fistulas. At entry, all patients received prednisolone (40 mg once a day) which was tapered over a period of 12 weeks unless their clinical condition deteriorated. All patients were randomised to receive i.v. methotrexate 25 mg/week, or oral azathioprine 2 mg/kg per day, for a 6-month follow-up period. After the first 3 months, methotrexate was switched to oral administration maintaining the same dose. The primary efficacy outcome considered was the proportion of patients entering first remission after 3 and 6 months of therapy. Clinical remission was defined as the lack of need for steroid treatment and a Crohn's Disease Activity Index score of < or = 150 points at each scheduled visit.
In the 54 patients (26 F, 28 M, mean age 34 years, range 18-60) randomly assigned to methotrexate (n=27) or azathioprine (n=27), no statistically significant difference was found between the two treatment regimens with respect to remission rate after 3 (methotrexate 44%, azathioprine 33%, p=0.28, (95% CI, 0.369-0.147), and 6 months (methotrexate 56%, azathioprine 63%, p=0.39, 95% CI, 0.187-0.335), respectively. Six patients withdrew from therapy due to adverse events: 3/27 (11%) in methotrexate and 3/27 (11%) in azathioprine. Drug-related adverse events (asthenia, nausea and vomiting) that did not require withdrawal from therapy were more frequent in the methotrexate group (azathioprine: 2/27 (7%); methotrexate: 12/27 (44%), p=0.00009). The frequency of these adverse events was comparable during the intravenous or oral administration of the drug.
This study confirms that methotrexate is effective in inducing remission in patients with chronic active Crohn's disease, therapeutic efficacy being comparable, but not faster, than that of azathioprine.
硫唑嘌呤治疗慢性活动性克罗恩病的疗效已得到充分证实。然而,这种药物起效时间长。甲氨蝶呤也已被证明对慢性活动性克罗恩病有效。本研究的目的是评估甲氨蝶呤与硫唑嘌呤相比的疗效和安全性,并确定在这种情况下甲氨蝶呤的起效时间是否更短。
慢性活动性克罗恩病患者被纳入这项研究者盲法研究。慢性定义为在前12个月内需要至少4个月每日服用≥10mg的类固醇激素治疗,且至少有一次尝试停药。入组时疾病必须处于临床活动期,克罗恩病活动指数≥200。分别接受硫唑嘌呤和甲氨蝶呤治疗的6例患者发现有肠皮肤瘘和肛周瘘。入组时,所有患者均接受泼尼松龙(每日40mg)治疗,除非临床病情恶化,否则在12周内逐渐减量。所有患者被随机分配接受静脉注射甲氨蝶呤25mg/周,或口服硫唑嘌呤2mg/kg/天,随访6个月。前3个月后,甲氨蝶呤改为口服给药,剂量不变。主要疗效指标是治疗3个月和6个月后首次缓解的患者比例。临床缓解定义为在每次预定访视时无需类固醇激素治疗且克罗恩病活动指数评分≤150分。
在随机分配接受甲氨蝶呤(n = 27)或硫唑嘌呤(n = 27)治疗的54例患者(26例女性,28例男性,平均年龄34岁,范围18 - 60岁)中,两种治疗方案在3个月(甲氨蝶呤44%,硫唑嘌呤33%,p = 0.28,(95%CI,0.369 - 0.147))和6个月(甲氨蝶呤56%,硫唑嘌呤63%,p = 0.39,95%CI,0.187 - 0.335)后的缓解率方面无统计学显著差异。6例患者因不良事件退出治疗:甲氨蝶呤组3/27(11%),硫唑嘌呤组3/27(11%)。不需要停药的药物相关不良事件(乏力、恶心和呕吐)在甲氨蝶呤组更常见(硫唑嘌呤:2/27(7%);甲氨蝶呤:12/27(44%),p = 0.00009)。这些不良事件在药物静脉注射或口服期间的发生率相当。
本研究证实甲氨蝶呤对诱导慢性活动性克罗恩病患者缓解有效,其治疗效果与硫唑嘌呤相当,但起效并不更快。