Rozental Tamara D, Beredjiklian Pedro K, Bozentka David J
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Oct;85(10):1956-60. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200310000-00014.
There is a paucity of data in the literature documenting the functional outcomes for patients who have been managed with a dorsal plate because of a distal radial fracture. The purpose of the present study was to determine the functional outcome and complications following dorsal plating for dorsally displaced, unstable fractures of the distal part of the radius.
The records of all patients who had been managed at our institution with dorsal plating because of a comminuted, dorsally displaced fracture of the distal part of the radius were reviewed. Patients with less than twelve months of follow-up were excluded from the study. Outcomes were evaluated at the time of the latest follow-up with use of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Gartland and Werley scoring system.
Twenty-eight patients (nineteen women and nine men) with a mean age of forty-two years formed the basis of the study. The mean duration of follow-up was twenty-one months. Nineteen patients had been treated with a Synthes pi plate, and nine had been treated with a low-profile plate. There were no instances of loss of reduction, malunion, or nonunion. The mean score on the DASH questionnaire was 14.5 points. All patients had an excellent (nineteen patients) or good (nine patients) result according to the scoring system of Gartland and Werley. Nine patients had postoperative complications requiring repeat surgical treatment for hardware removal or extensor tendon reconstruction. All nine reoperations were performed in patients who had been treated with a Synthes pi plate, while none were performed in patients who had been treated with a low-profile plate (p < 0.025). Four complications occurred in patients who had been treated with a titanium plate, and five complications occurred in patients who had been treated with a stainless-steel plate (p = 0.71).
Patients in whom a dorsally displaced distal radial fracture is treated with a titanium or stainless-steel Synthes pi plate have a significantly increased risk of complications compared with those in whom such a fracture is treated with a low-profile plate. Regardless of the type of plate used, all of the patients in the present study had a good or excellent long-term functional outcome.
文献中缺乏关于因桡骨远端骨折采用背侧钢板治疗的患者功能预后的数据。本研究的目的是确定桡骨远端背侧移位不稳定骨折采用背侧钢板固定后的功能预后及并发症。
回顾了在我院因桡骨远端粉碎性背侧移位骨折接受背侧钢板固定治疗的所有患者的记录。随访时间少于12个月的患者被排除在研究之外。在最近一次随访时,使用手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)问卷和Gartland和Werley评分系统对预后进行评估。
28例患者(19例女性和9例男性)构成了本研究的基础,平均年龄为42岁。平均随访时间为21个月。19例患者接受了Synthes pi钢板治疗,9例患者接受了低轮廓钢板治疗。没有出现复位丢失、畸形愈合或骨不连的情况。DASH问卷的平均评分为14.5分。根据Gartland和Werley评分系统,所有患者的结果均为优(19例患者)或良(9例患者)。9例患者出现术后并发症,需要再次手术取出内固定物或重建伸肌腱。所有9例再次手术均发生在接受Synthes pi钢板治疗的患者中,而接受低轮廓钢板治疗的患者均未进行再次手术(p < 0.025)。4例并发症发生在接受钛板治疗的患者中,5例并发症发生在接受不锈钢板治疗的患者中(p = 0.71)。
与采用低轮廓钢板治疗桡骨远端背侧移位骨折的患者相比,采用钛或不锈钢Synthes pi钢板治疗的患者并发症风险显著增加。无论使用何种类型的钢板,本研究中的所有患者均获得了良好或优异的长期功能预后。