Leon Martin B, Bakhai Ameet
Am Heart J. 2003 Oct;146(4 Suppl):S13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.09.004.
Although coronary stenting has improved the results of coronary interventions compared to coronary angioplasty alone, in-stent restenosis remains a significant limitation of this procedure. Drug-eluting stents with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy represent an additional advance in the evolution of this strategy.
We review the currently available trials comparing studies of non-drug-eluting and drug-eluting stents using sirolimus and paclitaxel agents and their derivatives.
Ten studies are available that compare drug-eluting to traditional non-drug-eluting stents. A variety of antiplatelet regimes have been used. The majority of these studies are in the process of being published. No head-to-head studies comparing different drug-eluting stents are available.
Drug-eluting stents using sirolimus and paclitaxel in combination with enhanced antiplatelet strategies represent an important advantage over non-drug-eluting stents for the reduction of in-stent restenosis. The rate at which drug-eluting stents are adapted into widespread practice depends heavily on whether they are safe, efficacious, and cost-effective in various clinical settings.
尽管与单纯冠状动脉血管成形术相比,冠状动脉支架置入术改善了冠状动脉介入治疗的效果,但支架内再狭窄仍是该手术的一个重大局限性。使用或不使用糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂治疗的药物洗脱支架是该策略发展中的又一进步。
我们回顾了目前比较使用西罗莫司和紫杉醇及其衍生物的非药物洗脱支架和药物洗脱支架研究的现有试验。
有10项研究比较了药物洗脱支架与传统非药物洗脱支架。使用了多种抗血小板方案。这些研究中的大多数正在发表过程中。尚无比较不同药物洗脱支架的直接对比研究。
西罗莫司和紫杉醇与强化抗血小板策略联合使用的药物洗脱支架在减少支架内再狭窄方面比非药物洗脱支架具有重要优势。药物洗脱支架在广泛临床实践中的应用速度在很大程度上取决于它们在各种临床环境中是否安全、有效和具有成本效益。