Bordin Paolo, Mazzone Carmine, Pandullo Claudio, Goldstein Daniela, Scardi Sabino
Department of Medicine, San Daniele del Friuli General Hospital, ASS4 Medio Friuli, Udine.
Ital Heart J. 2003 Aug;4(8):537-43.
In the elderly the impact of atrial fibrillation on mortality and morbidity is substantial. Oral anticoagulant therapy reduces the risk of stroke by 70%; nevertheless, it remains largely underused. We evaluated, in a community prospective study, the factors associated with embolic events and death and the feasibility of oral anticoagulant therapy managed by general practitioners.
We enrolled at the Trieste Cardiovascular Center 229 patients aged > or = 65 years with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation. At baseline, each patient underwent a transesophageal echocardiography and received instructions about oral anticoagulation. Patients were regularly followed by their general practitioner and finally evaluated at the Center.
At baseline, the mean age was 73 years, 14% of patients were free of heart disease, 27% had had a previous embolic event, and 33% had an atrial thrombus. After a 5-year follow-up, 85% of the patients had been admitted to hospital, 17% had suffered an embolic event, and 35% were dead. Diabetes and the presence of a low flow in the left atrial appendage were predictive of embolic events. Heart failure, spontaneous echocontrast and aortic plaques were predictive of death. Anticoagulant therapy increased from 14 to 34% but the incidence of major bleeding did not change. The patients on anticoagulant therapy at follow-up constituted the group with the worst cardiovascular profile and embolic rate, but had a lower death rate (19%) compared with those on antiplatelet therapy (32%) and with those without antithrombotic therapy (67%). The hospitalization rates were respectively 78, 83 and 100%.
In a group of elderly patients followed by their general practitioner with the support of a specialized cardiologic unit, oral anticoagulant therapy was well tolerated and associated with a significant decrease in mortality and hospitalization.
在老年人中,房颤对死亡率和发病率的影响很大。口服抗凝治疗可降低70%的中风风险;然而,其使用率仍然很低。我们在一项社区前瞻性研究中评估了与栓塞事件和死亡相关的因素,以及由全科医生管理口服抗凝治疗的可行性。
我们在的里雅斯特心血管中心纳入了229名年龄≥65岁的非风湿性房颤患者。在基线时,每位患者接受经食管超声心动图检查并接受口服抗凝指导。患者由其全科医生定期随访,最后在中心进行评估。
基线时,平均年龄为73岁,14%的患者无心脏病,27%的患者曾发生过栓塞事件,33%的患者有心房血栓。经过5年的随访,85%的患者曾住院,17%的患者发生过栓塞事件,35%的患者死亡。糖尿病和左心耳低血流是栓塞事件的预测因素。心力衰竭、自发回声增强和主动脉斑块是死亡的预测因素。抗凝治疗从14%增加到34%,但大出血的发生率没有变化。随访时接受抗凝治疗的患者心血管状况和栓塞率最差,但与接受抗血小板治疗(32%)和未接受抗血栓治疗(67%)的患者相比,死亡率较低(19%)。住院率分别为78%、83%和100%。
在一组由全科医生随访并得到专业心脏病学单位支持的老年患者中,口服抗凝治疗耐受性良好,且与死亡率和住院率显著降低相关。