Dickfeld Timm, Calkins Hugh, Zviman Muz, Kato Ritsushi, Meininger Glenn, Lickfett Lars, Berger Ron, Halperin Henry, Solomon Stephen B
Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md, USA.
Circulation. 2003 Nov 11;108(19):2407-13. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000093191.05433.B0. Epub 2003 Oct 20.
Targets for radiofrequency (RF) ablation of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and nonidiopathic ventricular tachycardia are increasingly being selected on the basis of anatomic considerations. Because fluoroscopy provides only limited information about the relationship between catheter positions and cardiac structures and is associated with radiation risk, other approaches to mapping may be beneficial.
An electromagnetic catheter positioning system was superimposed on 3D MR images using fiducial markers. This allowed the dynamic display of the catheter position on the true anatomy of previously acquired MR images in real time. In vitro accuracy and precision during catheter navigation were assessed in a phantom model and were 1.11+/-0.06 and 0.30+/-0.07 mm (mean+/-SEM), respectively. Left and right heart catheterization was performed in 7 swine without the use of fluoroscopy, yielding an in vivo accuracy and precision of 2.74+/-0.52 and 1.97+/-0.44 mm, respectively. To assess the reproducibility of RF ablation, RF lesions were created repeatedly at the identical anatomic site in the right atrium (n=8 swine). Average distance of the repeated right atrial ablations was 3.92+/-0.5 mm. Straight 3-point lines were created in the right and left ventricles to determine the ability to facilitate complex ablation procedures (n=6 swine). The ventricular lesions deviated 1.70+/-0.24 mm from a straight line, and the point distance differed by 2.25+/-0.63 mm from the pathological specimen.
Real-time display of the catheter position on 3D MRI allows accurate and precise RF ablation guided by the true anatomy. This may facilitate anatomically based ablation procedures in, for instance, atrial fibrillation or nonidiopathic ventricular tachycardia and decrease radiation times.
基于解剖学考虑,越来越多地选择对心房颤动、心房扑动和非特发性室性心动过速进行射频消融的靶点。由于荧光透视仅提供关于导管位置与心脏结构之间关系的有限信息,并且与辐射风险相关,其他标测方法可能有益。
使用基准标记将电磁导管定位系统叠加在三维磁共振图像上。这使得能够在先前获取的磁共振图像的真实解剖结构上实时动态显示导管位置。在体模模型中评估了导管导航过程中的体外准确性和精确性,分别为1.11±0.06和0.30±0.07毫米(平均值±标准误)。在7头猪身上进行了左、右心导管插入术,未使用荧光透视,体内准确性和精确性分别为2.74±0.52和1.97±0.44毫米。为了评估射频消融的可重复性,在右心房的相同解剖部位重复进行射频损伤(n = 8头猪)。重复右心房消融的平均距离为3.92±0.5毫米。在右心室和左心室中绘制直的三点线,以确定促进复杂消融手术的能力(n = 6头猪)。心室损伤偏离直线1.70±0.24毫米,点间距与病理标本相差2.25±0.63毫米。
在三维磁共振成像上实时显示导管位置可实现以真实解剖结构为导向的准确、精确射频消融。这可能有助于例如心房颤动或非特发性室性心动过速的基于解剖学的消融手术,并减少辐射时间。