Sheehan Nancy W, Oakes Claudia E
School of Family Studies, University of Connecticut, Storrs, 06269, USA.
Gerontologist. 2003 Oct;43(5):766-70. doi: 10.1093/geront/43.5.766.
Bringing state-subsidized assisted living services (ALS) into congregate housing (CH) is a strategy for reducing rates of nursing home placement. This article discusses CH residents' reactions as a new ALS program was introduced in their housing, and it provides recommendations for others who are considering the implementation of similar programs.
Focus groups and face-to-face interviews with residents in a CH facility explored their experiences over time with the new ALS program. Residents were interviewed before the program was initiated and 6 months later as a way to better understand their knowledge of and feelings about the program.
A qualitative analysis of the interview data revealed several patterns of complex attitudes and emotions linked to the program. Although the overwhelming majority of residents endorsed the program as a way to avoid nursing home placement, few understood the features of the program (e.g., cost and eligibility requirements). ALS participants' accounts of services suggested the presence of a highly "medicalized" approach.
When new community-based models are implemented for elders, policy makers need to evaluate how these programs affect quality of life. Further, program guidelines for bringing ALS into existing housing have to address how the program complements the home-like nature of the housing.
将国家补贴的辅助生活服务(ALS)引入集体住房(CH)是降低养老院安置率的一项策略。本文讨论了在集体住房中引入一项新的ALS项目时居民的反应,并为其他考虑实施类似项目的人提供建议。
对一个集体住房设施中的居民进行焦点小组讨论和面对面访谈,以探究他们在一段时间内参与新ALS项目的经历。在项目启动前和6个月后对居民进行访谈,以便更好地了解他们对该项目的了解程度和感受。
对访谈数据的定性分析揭示了与该项目相关的几种复杂态度和情绪模式。尽管绝大多数居民认可该项目是避免入住养老院的一种方式,但很少有人了解该项目的特点(如费用和资格要求)。ALS参与者对服务的描述表明存在一种高度“医疗化”的方式。
当为老年人实施新的社区模式时,政策制定者需要评估这些项目如何影响生活质量。此外,将ALS引入现有住房的项目指南必须解决该项目如何补充住房的家庭式特点的问题。